Significance of Simultaneous Use of Different Methods for Interpretation of Internal Quality Control Data
An Experience of a Tertiary Care Hospital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21276/apalm.2715Keywords:
quality control, LJ Chart, CUSUM, Westgard rulesAbstract
Background: Quality control is an essential part of quality management in medical laboratory. Various methods are available for the analysis of laboratory quality control data, common ones are Levey Jennings chart and Westgard rules. Westgard multi-rules are a set of rules based on combination of criteria to decide whether an analytical run is acceptable or unacceptable. CUSUM uses the cumulative sum of deviations from a target, however, it is rarely used in current medical laboratory practice. We share our experience of using Westgard rules and CUSUM in the analysis of laboratory quality control data.
Material and methods: Internal quality control values of 2-year period was included in the present study. Data for platelet count values of normal level control material run on a fully automated haematology analyser (Sysmex XT-2000i) were analysed. A total of 1825 data points were obtained. The data was interpreted by Westgard rules as well as cumulative sum method. The out of control events was analysed.
Results: There was 9 incidence of control value outside 3SD (Westgard Rule 13s) which was picked on Levey Jennings chart but missed by CUSUM method. There were 22 instances of shift in mean (bias) which were only picked by CUSUM method.
Conclusion: CUSUM was more sensitive for detection of bias whereas random error was picked-up early by Westgard rules. In conclusion we recommend the use of more than one method for analysis of quality control data.
References
2. Guidelines for good clinical laboratory practices (GCLP). New Delhi: Indian Council of Medical Research; 2008.
3. Momeni-Boroujeni A, Pincus MR. Systematic Error Detection in Laboratory Medicine. Quality Control in Laboratory. 2018:49.
4. Momeni A, Pincus M, Libien J. Introduction to statistical methods in pathology: Springer; 2018.
5. Karkalousos P, Evangelopoulos A. The history of statistical quality control in clinical chemistry and haematology (1950–2010). Int J Bio Lab Sci. 2015;4:1-11.
6. Levey S, Jennings ER. The use of control charts in the clinical laboratory. Am J Clin Pathol. 1950;20:1059-66.
7. Westgard JO, Barry PL, Hunt MR, Groth T. A multi-rule Shewhart chart for quality control in clinical chemistry. Clin Chem. 1981;27:493-501.
8. Chang WR, McLean IP. CUSUM: a tool for early feedback about performance? BMC medical research methodology. 2006;6:8.
9. Page E. Cumulative Sum Control Charts. Technometrics 1961;3:1-9.
10. Westgard J, Groth T, Aronsson T, De Verdier C. Combined Shewhart-cusum control chart for improved quality control in clinical chemistry. Clinical Chemistry. 1977;23:1881-7.
11. Fortea-Sanchis C, Escrig-Sos J. Quality Control Techniques in Surgery: Application of Cumulative Sum (CUSUM) Charts. CirugÃa Española (English Edition). 2019;97:65-70.
12. Gould AL. Control charts for monitoring accumulating adverse event count frequencies from single and multiple blinded trials. Stat Med. 2016;35:5561-78.
13. Righi L, Amarsy R, Picat MQ, Thuillier M, Cambau E, Raskine L, et al. Monitoring antimicrobial resistance (AMR) using CUSUM control charts. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. 2017;36:1519-25.
14. Rasmussen TB, Ulrichsen SP, Nørgaard M. Use of risk-adjusted CUSUM charts to monitor 30-day mortality in Danish hospitals. Clin Epidemiol. 2018;10:445-56.
15. Sampson ML, Gounden V, van Deventer HE, Remaley AT. CUSUM-Logistic Regression analysis for the rapid detection of errors in clinical laboratory test results. Clin Biochem. 2016;49:201-7.
16. Nightingale MJ, Madden S, Curnow E, Collett D, Procter S, Rowe GP. An evaluation of statistical process control techniques applied to blood component quality monitoring with particular reference to CUSUM. Transfus Med. 2012;22:285-93.
17. Woodall WH, Faltin FW. Rethinking control chart design and evaluation. Quality Engineering. 2019;31:596-605.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Shakti Kumar Yadav, Rupinder Kalra, Aarzoo Jahan, Sonam Kumar Pruthi, Namrata Sarin, Sompal Singh, Harsh Vardhan Singh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html).
