A Study to Assess the Utility of Cell Block Morphology and Immuno-Cytochemistry For Improving the Pre-Operative Diagnosis of Nodular Thyroid Lesions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21276/apalm.2857Keywords:
Thyroid, Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology, Cell Block, Immuno-cyto ChemistryAbstract
Background: Thyroid nodules are quite common in the general population of India with increasing incidence of malignancy worldwide. Fine Needle Aspiration [FNA] has been the primary modality of pre-operative diagnosis of such lesions till date. But it has got its own share of fallacies and pit-falls. Cell-block [CB] can be done in the same sitting and it gives the advantage of architectural assessment with easy subjectivity to immuno-cytochemical [ICC] staining.
Material and methods: FNA was done in all patients and CB was prepared by formalin method. ICC stains were used in cases with provisional diagnosis of malignancy and in all follicular neoplasm cases. SPSS v.20 was used for analysis. Sensitivity and specificity of cell block was calculated. Diagnostic correlation of both FNA and CB with respect to histopathological examination was done by using student t-test with confidence interval of 95%.
Results: CB showed a correlation coefficient of 0.704 and a p value of 0.0001while FNA showed a correlation coefficient of .464 and a p-value of .001. So, CB showed a strong positive correlation and a high statistical significance. Cell block helped in diagnosing almost all the cases showing discordance in FNA except that of papillary carcinoma where the cellular yield was poor due to cystic degeneration. Sensitivity of cell block was 89.5% and Specificity was 96.9%.
Conclusions: Cell block is definitely a good ancillary examination for thyroid nodular lesions in addition to FNA. It should be routinely performed in all thyroid cases as it improves the diagnostic yield and accuracy of cytological diagnosis.
References
2. Tunbridge WM, Evered DC, Hall R, Appleton D, Brewis M, Clark F, et al. The spectrum of thyroid disease in a community: The Whickham survey. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1977;7:481–93.
3. Menon UV, Sundaram KR, Unnikrishnan AG, Jayakumar RV, Nair V, Kumar H. High prevalence of undetected thyroid disorders in an iodine sufficient adult south Indian population. J Indian Med Assoc. 2009; 107:72–7.
4. Davies L, Welch HG. Increasing Incidence of Thyroid Cancer in the United States, 1973-2002. JAMA. 2006; 295:2164–7.
5. Mayall F, Chang B, Darlington A. A review of 50 consecutive cytology cell block preparation in a large general hospital. J ClinPathol 1997; 50:985–90.
6. Morgan JL, Serpell JW, Mb BS, Cheng MS, Mb F. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of thyroid nodules: How useful is it? ANZ J Surg. 2003; 73:480.
7. Hamburger JI, Husain M, Nishiyama R, et al. Increasing the accuracy of fine needle biopsy for thyroid nodules. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1989; 113:1035–41.
8. Boey J, Hsu C, Collins RJ. False negative errors in fine needle aspiration biopsy of dominant thyroid nodules: a prospective follow-up study. World J Surg 1986; 10: 623-30.
9. Cooper DS, Doherty GM, Haugen BR, et al. Management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Taskforce. Thyroid 2006;16:10942.
10. Mitteldorf C.A.T. S., Vilela R S., Barros A.C., Coudry R.A. Cell block specimens applied to diagnostic routine of thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsy. J. Bras. Patol. Med. Lab. [Internet]. 2018 Feb [cited 2020 June 17] ; 54( 1 ): 40-45.
11. Amrikachi M, Ramzy I, Rubenfeld S, Wheeler TM. Accuracy of fine-needle aspiration of thyroid. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2001; 125:484–8.
12. Cross PA, Chandra A, Giles T, Johnson S, Kocjan G, Poller D, Stephenson T. Guidance in the reporting of thyroid cytology specimens 2009 [Internet].
13. Clark OH. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy and management of thyroid tumors. Am J ClinPathol 1997;108(Suppl. 4):S22–5.
14. Smeds S, Lennquist S. The role of aspiration cytology in the management of thyroid nodules. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 1988; 24(2):293–7.
15. Ravetto C, Colombo L, Dottorini ME. Usefulness of fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of thyroid carcinoma: a retrospective study in 37,895 patients. Cancer 2000; 90:357–63.
16. Sangalli G, Serio G, Zampatti C, Bellotti M, Lomuscio G. Fine needle aspiration cytology of the thyroid: a comparison of 5469 cytological and final histological diagnoses. Cytopathology 2006; 17:245–50.
17. Borgohain R, Lal RK, Chatterjee P, Brahma N, Khanna S. A study of cyto-histological correlation in the diagnosis of thyroid swelling. IOSR J Dent Med Sci 2014; 13(11):46–9.
18. Kumar SK, Seetharamaiah T, Rampure D, Ramakrishna C, Devi RY. Thyroid Nodule: cytohistological Correlation. Scholar J Appl Med Sci 2013; 1:745–7.
19. Sharma C, Krishnanand G. Histologic analysis and comparison of techniques in fine needle aspiration-induced alterations in thyroid. Acta Cytol 2008; 52:56–64.
20. Nassar A, Cohen C., Siddiqui M.T. Utility of Millipore Filter and Cell Block in Thyroid Needle Aspirates: Which Method is Superior? Diagn. Cytopathol. 2007; 35:34–38.
21. Khurana KK, Truong LD, LiVolsi VA, Baloch ZW. Cytokeratin 19 immunolocalization in cell block preparation of thyroid aspirates. An adjunct to fine-needle aspiration diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2003; 127:579–83.
22. Bizzarro T, Martini M, Marrocco C, D’Amato D, Traini E, Lombardi CP, et al. The Role of CD56 in Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology: A Pilot Study Performed on Liquid Based Cytology. PLoS ONE 2015; 10(7): e0132939.
23. Sanchez N , Suzanne M. Utility of Cell Blocks in the Diagnosis of Thyroid Aspirates. Diagnostic Cytopathology, 2006; 34: 89-92.
24. Haltaş H., Bayrak R., Yenidünya S., Yildirim U. Diagnostic value of cytokeratin 19, HBME-1, and galectin-3 immunostaining of cell block from fine-needle aspiration specimens in papillary carcinoma of the thyroid. Turk J Med Sci,2013; 43: 625-30.
25. Orlandi F., Saggiorato E., Pivano G., et al. Galectin-3 Is a Presurgical Marker of Human Thyroid Carcinoma. Cancer Res 1998; 58:3015-20.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Shruti Mishra, Kishore Kumar S, Saumik Das, Aparajita Samaddar, Nandini Das, Dipanwita Nag
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html).
