The Chronicles of Myelodysplastic/ Myeloproliferative Legacy - Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia

Authors

  • Vinu Sugathan Department of Pathology Rajagiri Hospital
  • Latha K Abraham Department of Pathology Rajagiri Hospital
  • Mobin Paul Department of Clinical Haematology & Haemato-oncology, Rajagiri Hospital

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21276/apalm.2905

Keywords:

CMML, monocytosis, myelodysplastic, myeloproliferative

Abstract

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia is a heterogeneous syndrome with features of both myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). The varied clinical presentations add to the distinctiveness of the disease. This heterogeneity should invigorate the search for reliable predictors of evolution and progression of disease. We report a case series from a tertiary care centre in Kerala, South India. This was a retrospective observational study of all cases of CMML, which was diagnosed in the departments of Pathology and Clinical Haematology & Haemato- oncology of our institution between January 2017 to May 2020. The clinical presentation, laboratory investigations, and treatment details were noted. Nine cases of CMML were encountered during the study period. The mean age of study subjects was 70.4 years with a female predilection. Fever and weight loss were the most common clinical presentations. Four patients were classified as CMML- 2, three patients as CMML- 1, and two as CMML- 0. Based on the WBC count, five patients were classified as dysplastic and four as proliferative subtypes. Two patients had grade 1/3 (one case each of CMML- 2 and CMML- 1) and one patient had grade 2/3 fibrosis (a case of CMML- 1) in the bone marrow. Thirty-three percentage patients had clonal cytogenetic abnormalities, the commonest being trisomy 8. Renal function was deranged in three patients and two patients had a deranged liver function and hepatomegaly. Four patients underwent treatment with hypomethylating agents or cytoreduction with hydroxyurea. One of the patients (CMML- 2 with marked leucocytosis) succumbed to disease.

References

Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood. 2016;127(20):2391-2405.

Patnaik MM, Parikh SA, Hanson CA, Tefferi A. Chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia: a concise clinical and pathophysiological review. Br J Haematol. 2014;165(3):273-286.

Kohlmann A, Grossmann V, Klein HU, et al. Next-generation sequencing technology reveals a characteristic pattern of molecular mutations in 72.8% of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia by detecting frequent alterations in TET2, CBL, RAS, and RUNX1. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(24):3858-3865.

Martiat P, Michaux JL, Rodhain J (1991). Philadelphia -negative (Ph-) chronic myeloidleukemia (CML): comparison with Ph+ CML and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. The Groupe Francais de Cytogenetique Hematologique. Blood. 78:205- 11.

Orazi A, Chiu R, O'Malley DP, et al.(2006). Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: The role of bone marrow biopsy immunohistology.Mod Pathol. 19:1536-45.

Selimoglu-Buet D, Wagner-Ballon 0, Saada V, et al. (2015). Characteristic repartition of monocyte subsets as a diagnostic signature of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Blood. 125:3618-26.

Greenberg P, Cox C, LeBeau MM, et al International scoring system for evaluating prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 1997;89(6):2079-2088

Padron E, Garcia-Manero G, Patnaik MM, et al. An international data set for CMML validates prognostic scoring systems and demonstrates a need for novel prognostication strategies. Blood Cancer J. 2015; 5:e333

Hunter AM, Zhang L, Padron E. Current Management and Recent Advances in the Treatment of Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2018;19(12):67. Published 2018 Oct 27. doi:10.1007/s11864-018-0581-6

Nabeel Azeez K , Venkatesan Somasundaram , Isha Sharma , Sanjeevan Sharma and Ajay Malik .Clinicopathological Profile of Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia Cases: An Experience from A Tertiary Care Center , Annals of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vol. 6, Issue 10, October, 2019, eISSN: 2349-6983; pISSN: 2394-6466

Patnaik MM, Wassie EA, Padron E, et al. Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia in younger patients: molecular and cytogenetic predictors of survival and treatment outcome [published correction appears in Blood Cancer J. 2015;5:e280] [published correction appears in Blood Cancer J. 2015;5:e280]. Blood Cancer J. 2015;5(1):e270.

Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, et al. Proposals for the classification of the acute leukaemias. French-American-British (FAB) co-operative group. Br JHaematol. 1976;33:451–458

Germing U, Kündgen A, GattermannN. Risk assessment in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia(CMML). Leuk Lymphoma. 2004;45(7):1311â€1318.

Patnaik MM, Tefferi A. Cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Blood Cancer J. 2016; 6:e 393.

Petrova-Drus, K., Chiu, A., Margolskee, E., Barouk-Fox, S., Geyer, J., Dogan, A., & Orazi, A. (2017). Bone marrow fibrosis in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia is associated with increased megakaryopoiesis, splenomegaly and with a shorter median time to disease progression. Oncotarget, 8(61), 103274–103282.

Downloads

Published

30-11-2020

How to Cite

1.
Sugathan V, Abraham LK, Paul M. The Chronicles of Myelodysplastic/ Myeloproliferative Legacy - Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia. Ann of Pathol and Lab Med [Internet]. 2020 Nov. 30 [cited 2024 Nov. 19];7(11):C149-154. Available from: https://pacificejournals.com/journal/index.php/apalm/article/view/2905

Issue

Section

Case Report