Auditing Histopathology Processes to Augment Reporting Quality: An Objective Analysis in a Tertiary Care Neuropathology Laboratory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21276/apalm.3147Keywords:
Laboratory audit, histopathology, quality improvement processAbstract
Background: Laboratory audits are an integral component of the continuous quality improvement process and one of the key elements of quality control in the laboratories. These audits are primarily concerned with the everyday aspects of laboratory services and are a means of providing feedback to the users of the laboratory and its staff. These audits measure the performance of laboratory services against established standards that are evidence based and established by the audit team itself. This original study was initiated with an objective to audit all those histopathology processes that are involved in the generation of a quality histopathology report. The purpose was to detect the gaps which in turn maybe used to reduce and avoid errors in the processes, thus improvising the quality assurance practices of the histopathology laboratory.
Materials and Methods: In this retrospective cross- sectional study, total twenty standards were audited, including the clinical details, the pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical laboratory processes.
Results: Overall, out of the 20 standards audited it was found that in the first audit, full compliance was observed in 10 standards, whereas the re-audit showed full compliance in 11 standards. Undoubtedly the compliance showed an improving trend in the re-audit.
Conclusion: such laboratory-based audits not only form an integral component of the quality assurance programs but definitely add on to the quality of patient care, as the reports generated by the histopathology laboratories do help the treating team in deciding or modifying the treatment plan in central nervous system and spinal tumours.
References
Iyengar JN. Quality control in the histopathology laboratory: An overview with stress on the need for a structured national external quality assurance scheme. Indian J PatholMicrobiol 2009; 52:
Zuk JA, Kenyon WE, Myskow MW. Audit in histopathology: Description of aninternal quality assessment scheme with analysis of preliminary results. J Clin Pathol 1991; 44: 10-16
Omorodion NT, Achukwu PU, Ebo N. Review on Laboratory Auditing in Histopathology Laboratory. Sokoto Journal of Medical Laboratory Science 2017; 2: 124 – 128
Wiwanitkit V. Types and frequency of pre-analytical mistakes in the first Thai ISO 9002:1994 certified clinical laboratory: A 6-month monitoring. BMC Clinical Pathology 2001; 1:1-5
Sharif MQ, Mushtaq S, Mamoon N, Jamal S, Luqman, M. Clinician's responsibility in pre-analytical quality assurance of histopathology. Pakistani Journal of Medical Science 2007; 23:720-723
Erasmus RT, Zemlin AE. Clinical audit in the laboratory. J Clin Pathol2009; 62:593–597
Karki S. Errors: Detection and minimization in histopathology laboratories. Journal of Pathology of Nepal 2015; 5: 859-864
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Ishita Pant, Sujata Chaturvedi, Chandra Bhushan Tripathi, Anchit Goel, Pragyan Sarma, Dinesh Kumar Satti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html).