A Study of AgNOR Scores on FNAC of Breast Lumps and Its Correlation with Histopathological Grading

Rumana Tasneem; Manjunath M R; Muralidhar Bhat Y

doi:10.21276/apalm.3187

Authors

Rumana Tasneem Department of Pathology, Mysore Medical College, Mysore, Karnataka
Manjunath M R Department of Pathology, Mandya Institute of Medical Sciences, Mandya, Karnataka
Muralidhar Bhat Y Department of Pathology, Mandya Institute of Medical Sciences, Mandya, Karnataka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21276/apalm.3187

Keywords:

AgNOR, Breast lesions, FNAC, Histopathological grading, Non- neoplastic, Neoplastic

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer is one of the leading cancers in women both in developed and developing countries. Nucleolar Organizer Regions (NORs) are loops of DNA related to protein synthesis and ribosomal activity. Argyrophilic Nucleolar Organizer Region (AgNOR) counts act as a reliable cell proliferative marker as they aid in identifying cell proliferation activity and aggressiveness of a lesion, and thereby helps in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions.

Aim: To evaluate the role of AgNOR count in differentiating benign and malignant breast lumps.

Methods: All breast lump specimens collected for Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) and histopathology, for a period of one year, were included in the study. A total of 69 specimens were included. All FNAC and histopathology slides were stained with AgNOR stain, and the score was recorded.

Result: A total of 69 cases were studied, both non-neoplastic and neoplastic breast lesions. All FNAC cases correlated histologically. Out of the 69 cases, 38 were malignant. The mean AgNOR counts in non-neoplastic, benign and malignant breast lesions were found to be 2.19, 2.88 and 5.94 respectively (p<0.05). Other parameters such as proliferative AgNOR index, AgNOR size variation, AgNOR distribution within the nucleus and the Subjective AgNOR Pattern Assessment (SAPA) scores also showed statistically significant difference between benign and malignant lesions.

Conclusion: AgNOR scores showed good correlation in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions, they can be used as a reliable tool to aid in the diagnosis.

References

Ahmed HG, Al-Adhraei MA, Ashankyty IM. Association between AgNORs and Immunohistochemical Expression of ER, PR, HER2/neu, and p53 in Breast Carcinoma. Patholog Res Int. 2011;2011:1-6.

Park K. Textbook of Preventive & Social Medicine. 24th ed. Bhanot: Jabalpur; 2017.

Rajini S, Vell C K and Senthil S. Knowledge of breast cancer and its risk factors among rural women of Puducherry â€“ A cross sectional study. International Journal of Current Research and Review 2015;79:60-4.

Statistics of Breast Cancer in Bengaluru. Available from: http://breastcancerindia.net/statistics/stat_bengaluru.html (Accessed on 10th September, 2018)

Aydiner A, Igci A, Soran A. Breast Disease Diagnosis and Pathology. 1st ed. Springer International: Switzerland; 2016.

Nepal N, Talwar O. Evaluation of AgNoR scores in aspiration cytology smears of breast lesions and their correlation with histopathology. J Pathol Nep 2014;4:649-53.

Robinson IA, McKee G, Nicholson A, Dâ€™Arcy J, Jackson PA, Cook MG, et al. Prognostic value of cytological grading of fine-needle aspirates from breast carcinomas. Lancet 1994; 343:947â€“9.

Meyer J S, Alvarez C, Milikowski C, Neal Olson, Russo I, Russo J, et al. Breast carcinoma malignancy grading by Bloomâ€“Richardson system vs proliferation index: reproducibility of grade and advantages of proliferation index. Mod Pathol 2005;18:1067â€“78.

Thippeswamy SH, Bastian TS, Prasad V, Suresh T. Silver-stained nuclear organizer regions (AgNORs) â€“ Predictors of Incipient Cellular Alterations â€“ A Review. Int J Res Health Allied Sci 2015;1:16-9.

Murgod S, Channabasaviah GH, Shivamurthy DM, Ashok L, Krishnappa SJ. Prognostic potential of AgNORs in oral submucous fibrosis. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2016;6:167-75.

Hasan TB, Karim S, Hossain MI, Hassan MQ, Nasreen S, Bhattacharjee P, et al.Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of AgNORs in FNAC Smears of Palpable Breast Lumps. Chattagram Maa-O-Shishu Hospital Medical College Journal. 2016;15:14-40.

Meehan SM, Magee H, Carney DN, Dervan PA. The diagnostic value of silver nucleolar organizer region assessment in breast cytology. Am J Clin Pathol 1994;101:689-93.

Orrea SC, Tomasi VH, Schwint AE, Itoiz ME. Modified silver staining of nucleolar organizer regions to improve the accuracy of image analysis. Biotech Histochem 2001;76:67-73.

Bukhari MH, Niazi S, Khan SA, Hashmi I, Perveen S, Qureshi SS, Chaudhry NA, Qureshi GR, Hasan M. Modified method of AgNOR staining for tissue and interpretation in histopathology. Int J Exp Pathol 2007;88:47-53.

Fallowfield M.E. & Cook M.G. The value of nucleolar organizer region staining in the differential diagnosis of borderline melanocytic lesions. Histopathology 1989;14:299-304.

Warnakulasuriya KA, Johnson NW. Nucleolar organiser region (NOR) distribution as a diagnostic marker in oral keratosis, dysplasia and squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Pathol 1993;22:77-81.

Khanna AK, Yadav SK, Dixit VK, Kumar M. AgNOR count and subjective AgNOR pattern assessment (SAPA) score in carcinoma of the pancreatic head including periampullary tumors. JOP 2005;6:575-80.

Rawat N, Iyengar S. Analysis of Silver Binding Nucleolar Organizer Regions (AgNORs) and Mitotic Index in Glioblastomas. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences 2019;18:63-7.

Madhavi B V, Ravishankar B. Study of AgNOR counts in cytological smears of breast lesions. Indian Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Research 2016;5:380-6.

Ansari HA, Mehdi G, Maheshwari V, Siddiqui SA. Evaluation of AgNOR scores in aspiration cytology smears of breast tumors. J Cytol 2008;25:100-4.

Hussain D, Ahmad F, Awasthi S, Kumar A, Dutta S. Significance of Silver Stained Nucleolar Organiser Region (AgNOR) in Fine Needle Aspiration Smears of Breast Lesions. Int Arch BioMed Clin Res 2017;3:19-23.

Joseph FA, Munavarah SA. Value of AgNOR parameters in evaluation of epithelial breast lesions on cytology. International Journal of Scientific Research 2020;9:22-5.