Critical Analysis Of Bone Marrow Studies - A 5 Year Experience

Authors

  • Jerusha Samuela Jacob Department of Pathology,Sri Ramachandra Medical College &Research Institute,Chennai,Tamilnadu,India
  • Febe Renjitha Suman Department of Pathology,Sri Ramachandra Medical College &Research Institute,Chennai,Tamilnadu,India
  • Sai Shalini C.N Department of Pathology,Sri Ramachandra Medical College &Research Institute,Chennai,Tamilnadu,India
  • Rithika Rajendran Department of Pathology,Sri Ramachandra Medical College &Research Institute,Chennai,Tamilnadu,India
  • Ravi Teja J Department of Pathology,Sri Ramachandra Medical College &Research Institute,Chennai,Tamilnadu,India
  • Jesu Magdalene S Department of Pathology,Sri Ramachandra Medical College &Research Institute,Chennai,Tamilnadu,India

Keywords:

Bone marrow studies, bone marrow aspirate, bone marrow biopsy, trephine biopsy

Abstract

Introduction:Bone marrow Aspirate (BMA) and bone marrow trephine biopsy (BMB) are the two diagnostic procedures done to evaluate various hematologic and non-hematologic conditions.Though both the procedures done on the same day are complementary to each other, discrepancies do occur. In few instances aspirate alone is done without a biopsy.This study is aimed to statistically analyze the diagnostic value of both the procedures and the lacuna observed.

Materials and methods:A retrospective laboratory record based analysis was done on the bone marrow investigations reported during a period of 5 years (Jan.2011 – Dec.2015). The bone marrow investigations with simultaneous BMA and BMB done during the period of study were included.  Descriptive statistical analysis was donefor correlation of BMA and BMB diagnosis.

Results:Aspirate and biopsy were done on 934 cases. The diagnostic sensitivity of BMB was 94.74% and BMA was 86.14%.  BMB and BMA were complementary to each other in 53.21% cases.  BMB alone was diagnostic in 33.61% cases and BMA alone was diagnostic in 9.31% cases.  Inadequate material for diagnosis was noted in 8.35% of BMB cases and 27.41% of BMAcases.Good positive correlation was noted in cases of immune thrombocytopenic purpura, multiple myeloma, anemia,reactive marrow and chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Conclusion:Though both the procedures were complimentary to each other, inadequate aspirates due to disease conditions and faulty techniques were major drawbacks. It is preferable to perform both the procedures simultaneously for a more conclusive diagnosis.

DOI: 10.21276/APALM.1601

References

1. Islam A. Bone marrow aspiration before bone marrow core biopsy using the same bone marrow biopsy needle: a good or bad practice?. J ClinPathol. 2007;60:212-215.

2. Chandra S, Chandra H. Comparison of bone marrow aspirate cytology, touch imprint cytology and trephine biopsy for bone marrow evaluation. Hematol Rep. 2011;3:65-68.

3. Aljadayeh MH, Saidat SD, Kamal N, Telfah A. Comparative Evaluation between Bone Marrow Aspirate and Biopsy Morphologic Findings, Experience At King Hussein Medical Center. JRMS. 2015;22:18-22.

4. Toi PC, Varghese RB, Rai R. Comparative evaluation of simultaneous bone marrow aspiration and bone marrow biopsy: an institutional experience. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2010;26:41-44.

5. Mahajan V, Kaushal V, Thakur S, Kaushik R. A comparative study of bone marrow aspiration and bone marrow biopsy in haematological and non haematological disorders–An institutional experience.JIACM. 2013;14;133-135.

6. Khan TA, Khan IA, Mahmood K. Diagnostic role of bone marrow aspiration and trephine biopsy in haematological practice. J Postgrad Med Institute. 2014;28:217-221.

7. Bain BJ. Bone marrow trephine biopsy. J ClinPathol. 2001; 54:737-742.

8. Štifter S, Babarović E, Valković T, Seili-Bekafigo I, Štemberger C, Načinović A, Lučin K, Jonjić N. Combined evaluation of bone marrow aspirate and biopsy is superior in the prognosis of multiple myeloma. Diagnpathol. 2010; 5:30-37.

9. Sitalakshmi S, Srikrishna A, Devi S, Damodar P, Alexander B. The diagnostic utility of bone marrow trephine biopsies. Indian J PatholMicrobiol. 2005; 48:173176.

10. Nanda A, Basu S, Marwaha N. Bone marrow trephine biopsy as an adjunct to bone marrow aspiration. J Assoc Physicians India. 2002; 50:893-895.

11. Kaur M, Rana AP, Kapoor S, Puri A. Diagnostic Value of Bone Marrow Aspiration and Biopsy in Routine Hematology Practice. JCDR. 2014;8:FC13-16.

12. Winfield DA, Polacarz SV. Bone marrow histology. 3: Value of bone marrow core biopsy in acute leukaemia, myelodysplastic syndromes, and chronic myeloid leukaemia. J ClinPathol. 1992;45:855-859

13.MuslinoA,GuazziA,NizzoliR,PanebiancoM,ManciniC,ArdizzoniA.Accuracy and relative value of bone marrow aspiration in the detection of lymphoid infiltration in non – Hodgkin lymphoma.Tumori.2010;96;24-27.

14. .Mishra P, Das S, Kar R, Jacob SE, Basu D. Non-haematopoietic malignancies metastasing to the bone marrow: A 5 year record-based descriptive study from a tertiary care centre in South India. India. Indian J Cancer. 2014;51:30-34 Indian J Cancer. 2014;51:30-34

Downloads

Published

27-01-2018

How to Cite

1.
Jacob JS, Suman FR, C.N SS, Rajendran R, J RT, S JM. Critical Analysis Of Bone Marrow Studies - A 5 Year Experience. Ann of Pathol and Lab Med [Internet]. 2018 Jan. 27 [cited 2024 Oct. 30];5(1):A34-38. Available from: https://pacificejournals.com/journal/index.php/apalm/article/view/apalm1601

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2018)

Section

Original Article

License

Copyright (c) 2018 Jerusha Samuela Jacob, Febe Renjitha Suman, Sai Shalini C.N, Rithika Rajendran, Ravi Teja J, Jesu Magdalene S

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html).