Tuberculous versus malignant peritoneal effusion: a diagnostic dilemma when both conditions coexist

Authors

  • Shailaja Shukla Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, India
  • Preeti Rai Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, India
  • Geetika Sharma Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, India
  • Aruna Chikkara Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, India

Keywords:

peritoneal effusion, peritonitis carcinomatosis, ovarian cancer, tuberculous peritonitis, tubo-ovarian masses

Abstract

Differential diagnosis between tuberculous peritonitis and peritonitis carcinomatosis is often extremely difficult as they share common clinical and radiologic findings like ascitis, adnexal masses and elevated CA 125 levels in women. The diagnostic dilemma is further confounded when the two conditions co-exist. Overwhelming clinical features of tuberculosis may at times mask the co-existent malignant pathology leading to its underdiagnosis by the clinicians, thereby impacting the further management of the patient.

We present a case of an elderly woman who presented with abdominal distension and weight loss. Her CA 125 level was raised to 529 U/ml. Imaging studies revealed adnexal masses and ascitis. Ovarian malignancy was highly suspected but histology of endometrial biopsy showed tuberculosis. Anti-tubercular treatment was administered and the patient showed mild initial improvement but worsening of clinical and biochemical parameters occurred later due to co-existent malignancy for which no treatment was given.

This case highlights the importance of a co-ordinated team work between the physician, radiologist and the pathologist. It also emphasizes the need for careful, correct and detailed analysis and interpretation of the biochemical and pathological test results to reach to a correct diagnosis.

Author Biographies

Shailaja Shukla, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, India

Professor of Pathology

Preeti Rai, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, India

Associate Professor in Department of Pathology

Geetika Sharma, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, India

Senior Resident in Department of Pathology

Aruna Chikkara, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, India

Senior Resident in Department of Pathology

References

1. Vagenas K, Stratis C, Spyropoulos C, Spiliotis J etal.Peritoneal carcinomatosis versus peritoneal tuberculosis: a rare diagnostic dilemma in ovarian masses. Cancer Therapy 2005;3:489-494.
2. Bayramicli-Uygur O, Dabak G, Dabak R. A clinical dilemma: Abdominal tuberculosis. World J Gastroenterol 2003;9:1098-1101.
3. Kadayifci A, Simsek H, Savas MC, Toppare M. Serum tumor markers in chronic liver disease. Neoplasma 1996;43:17-21.
4. Wu JF, Li HJ, Lee PI, Ni YH et al. Tuberculous peritonitis mimicking peritonitis carcinomatosis: a case report. Eur J Pediatr 2003;162:853-855.
5. Mpiura B, Rabinovich A, Leron E, Yanai-Inbar I et al.Peritoneal tuberculosis- an uncommon disease that may deceive gynaecologist. Eur J GynecolOncol 2003;110:230-234.
6. Corapcioglu F, Guvenc BH, Nazan Sarper, Aysen Aydogan et al. Peritoneal tuberculosis with elevated serum CA125 level mimicking advanced ovarian carcinoma in an adolescent. The Turkish Journal of Pediatrics 2006;48:69-72.
7. Xiang-QianHou, Hai-Hong Cui, Xing Jin. Coexistence of tuberculous peritonitis and primary papillaryserous carcinoma of the peritoneum: A case report and review of the literature. World J Gastroenterol 2009;15(6):761-763.

Downloads

Published

29-07-2016

How to Cite

1.
Shukla S, Rai P, Sharma G, Chikkara A. Tuberculous versus malignant peritoneal effusion: a diagnostic dilemma when both conditions coexist. Ann of Pathol and Lab Med [Internet]. 2016 Jul. 29 [cited 2024 Nov. 19];3(3):C135-137. Available from: https://pacificejournals.com/journal/index.php/apalm/article/view/apalm628

Issue

Section

Case Report