Emergence of Chikungunya infection in North India

Authors

  • Krunal D Mehta Assistant Professor,Department of Microbiology MPSMC, Jamnagar, Gujarat, India
  • Shruti Malik MD PDCC (Infectious Diseases), Senior resident, Department of Microbiology, SGPGIMS, Lucknow, U.P., India
  • K P Singh Associate professor, Department of Microbiology, SGPGIMS, Lucknow, U.P., India
  • T N Dhole MD Microbiology, Professor and Head, Department of Microbiology, SGPGIMS, Lucknow, U.P. India

Keywords:

Age, Chikungunya, Clinical features, Seasonal variation, sex correlation.

Abstract

Background: Since re-emergence of chikungunya virus (CHIKV) infection in Indian subcontinent in 2005, it has become a major public health threat. Because of paucity of literature from north India, we undertook this study to determine incidence of Chikungunya infection and to assess clinical spectrum of disease.

Methods: 248 clinically suspected cases of CHIKV were enrolled. IgM ELISA for CHIKV was done on all samples. RT- PCR for CHIKV was performed on 53 selected samples.

Result: Thirty samples were positive for CHIKV IgM  Ab of total 248 suspected cases. Of 53 samples tested by RT-PCR, 17 were found to be positive. Majority of the confirmed cases were in age group 21-40 yrs. Male: female ratio was 1.38:1. The most common clinical features were fever with joint pain and rash. Apthous ulcers were seen in 36% and arthritis was seen in 25% of the confirmed cases. Lymph nodes were enlarged in 16% and hemorrhagic manifestations were seen in 15.9% of the positive cases. Neurological involvement was present in 7 of the CHIKV infected cases and was more common in young children. Case fatality rate amongst CHIKV infected was 4.5% (2/248, both children).

Conclusion: CHIKV IgM positivity of 12% was seen in the present study. Largest proportion of confirmed cases was in the age group 21-40 years. Neurological manifestations were present in 7 of CHIKV confirmed cases, five being children. Mortality in confirmed cases was 4.5%.  The increased severity of illnesss & high case fatality rate among children demands for a more detailed understanding of the neurotropism & needs to be analysed in detail.

 

References

1. Pialoux G, Gaüzère B, Jauréguiberry S, Strobel M. Chikungunya, an epidemic arbovirus. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007;7:319–27.
2. Directorate of National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme (NVBDCP), Directorate General of Health Services, Government of India. Chikungunya Fever situation in the country during 2006. Available at: http://www.namp.gov.in/chikun-cases.html, accessed on October 28, 2006.
3. Government of India, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare. Update on Chikungunya. Available at: http://www.nvpdep:gov.in/doc/chikungunyaupdate.pdf, accessed on October 28, 2006.
4. Marion R. An epidemic of virus disease in Southern Povince, Tanganyika Territory in 1952, 53. Clinical features. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1955; 49: 28-32.
5. Chatterjee SN, Chakravarti SK, Mitra AC, Sarkar JK. Virological investigation of cases with neurological complications during the outbreak of haemorrhagic fever in Calcutta. J Indian Med Assoc. 1965; 45: 314-6.
6. Shah KV, Gibbs CJ Jr, Banerjee G. Virological investigation of the epidemic of haemorrhagic fever in Calcutta: isolation of three strains of Chikungunya virus. Indian J Med Res. 1964; 52: 676-83.
7. Arankalle VA et al. Genetic divergence of Chikungunya viruses in India (1963–2006) with special reference to the 2005–2006 explosive epidemics. J Gen Virol. 2007; 88: 1967–76.
8. Yergolkar PN et al. Chikungunya outbreaks caused by African genotype, India. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006; 12: 1580–3.
9. Lahariya C, Pradhan SK. Emergence of chikungunya virus in Indian subcontinent after 32 years: A review. J Vector Borne Dis. 2006; 43: 151–60.
10. Kumar NP, Joseph R, Kamaraj T, Jambulingam P A226V mutation in virus during the 2007 chikungunya outbreak in Kerala, India. J Gen Virol. 2008; 89: 1945–8.
11. Ravi V. Re-emergence of chikungunya virus in India. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2006; 24: 83-4.
12. National Institute of Communicable Disease, New Delhi. Chikungunya fever. Commun Dis Alert. 2006; 10: 6-8.
13. NVBDCP: Epidemiological profile of chikungunya fever in the country. (prov.). 2009 [http://nvbdcp.gov.in/Doc/chikun-update07.pdf]. New Delhi: National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme.
14. NVBDCP: Status report on Dengue and Chikungunya as on 31.12.09(Dengue and chikungunya update). 2010 [http://nvbdcp.gov.in/Doc/Den_Chik_Dec09.pdf]. New Delhi: National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme.
15. Moro ML et al. Chikungunya virus in North-Eastern Italy: A Seroprevalence study. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010;82:508-511.
16. Mavalankar D, Shastri P, Raman P. Chikungunya epidemic in India: a major public-health disaster. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007; 7: 306-7.
17. Suryawanshi et al. Clinical profile of chikungunya fever in patients in a tertiary care centre in Maharashtra, India. Indian J Med Res. 2009; 129:438-441.

Downloads

Published

18-10-2016

How to Cite

1.
Mehta KD, Malik S, Singh KP, Dhole TN. Emergence of Chikungunya infection in North India. Ann of Pathol and Lab Med [Internet]. 2016 Oct. 18 [cited 2025 Feb. 6];3(4):A314-319. Available from: https://pacificejournals.com/journal/index.php/apalm/article/view/apalm782

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 4 (2016)

Section

Original Article

License

Copyright (c) 2016 Krunal D Mehta, Shruti Malik, K P Singh, T N Dhole

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html).