Correlation of Histopathological Study of Breast Lesions with cytology and mammography as a measure of internal quality and diagnostic accuracy

Authors

  • Anusha Mulka Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute,Pillaiyarkuppam,Pondicherry- cuddalore Road,Pondicherry 607402
  • Vaishali Dhananjay Kotasthane Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute,Pillaiyarkuppam,Pondicherry- cuddalore Road,Pondicherry 607402
  • Rajendra Dhaka Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute,Pillaiyarkuppam,Pondicherry- cuddalore Road,Pondicherry 607402
  • Dhananjay Shrikant Kotasthane Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute,Pillaiyarkuppam,Pondicherry- cuddalore Road,Pondicherry 607402

Keywords:

Triple test, Histopathology, cytology, mammography, Breast lesions, Fibroadenoma, Infiltrating ductal carcinoma

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer is the one of the leading causes death in women. Triple test approach has been widely accepted in asymptomatic women for the preoperative diagnosis of the breast lesions. Triple test includes clinical examination, mammography and Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) to differentiate between neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions, histopathological confirmation being the gold standard for neoplasticlesions and best management plan for the patient.

The aim was to study the histopathological spectrum of breast lesions and correlate the cytological and radiological findings with histopathological examination and to determine sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of  FNACand mammography in the diagnosis of the breast lesions.

Methods: The study comprised of 552 casesofhistopathologically diagnosed breast lesions over the period of twelve years in a rural tertiary health care centre catering rural population.

Results: Of the 552 cases examinedhistopathologically, 375 cases (67.9%) were benign lesions, 177 cases (32.1%) were malignant. Fibroadenoma was the commonest benign lesion, whereas infiltrating ductal carcinoma was the commonest malignant tumour. Incidence of phyllodes tumour was significantly higher compared to other studies. Overall sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of FNAC and mammography were 95.9%, 98%, 96.6% and 84.7%, 78.5%,81.1% respectively.

Conclusion: Histopathology plays an important role in diagnostic and therapeutic management of neoplastic breast lesionswith preoperative Triple test being an important supportive investigation in rapid diagnosis withfairly good sensitivity,specificity and diagnostic accuracyin neoplastic lesions. Significantly higher incidence of phyllodes tumor needs further investigation for causative mechanism.

 

DOI: 10.21276/APALM.1427

Author Biographies

Anusha Mulka, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute,Pillaiyarkuppam,Pondicherry- cuddalore Road,Pondicherry 607402

Post Graduate ,Department of Pathology

Vaishali Dhananjay Kotasthane, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute,Pillaiyarkuppam,Pondicherry- cuddalore Road,Pondicherry 607402

Associate Professor,Department of Pathology

Rajendra Dhaka, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute,Pillaiyarkuppam,Pondicherry- cuddalore Road,Pondicherry 607402

Professor,Department of Pathology

Dhananjay Shrikant Kotasthane, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute,Pillaiyarkuppam,Pondicherry- cuddalore Road,Pondicherry 607402

Professor and head,Department of pathology

References

1. Guray M, Sahin A. Benign Breast Diseases: Classification, Diagnosis and Management. Oncologist. 2006; 11(5): 435-49.
2. Ibrahim E M, Zeeneldin A A, Sadiq BB, Ezzat AA. Breast Cancer in Saudi Arabia Incidence Developing Country. Medical Oncology. 2008; 25:387 – 393
3. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Estimates the world cancer burden. Globocon 2000.Int J cancer. 2001; 94: 153-56.
4. Rahbar G, Sie A C, Hansen GC, Prince JS, Melany ML, Reynold HE, Jackson VP, Sayre JW and Bassett LW. Benign versus solid breast Masses: US differentiation. Radiology 1999; 213: 889-94.
5. Desai M. Role of obstetrician and gynecologist in management of breast lump. J Obst Gynaecol India.2003; 53:389-91.
6. Santen RJ, Mansel R. Benign breast disorders. N Engl J Med. 2005; 353:275-85.
7. Douglas J, Merchant MD. Benign Breast Diseases. Obst Gynaecol Clinics of North America. 2002; 29(1): 1-2.
8. Haagensen CD. The basis forthe histologic grading of carcinoma of the breast. Amer. Cancer 19 (1933), 235. Diseases of the breast. WB Saunders Co., Philadelphia and London: 1956.
9. Goehring C, Morabia A .Epidemiology of Benign Breast Disease, with Special Attention to Histologic Types. Epidemiol Rev.1997; 19(2):310-22.
10. Dixon J M, Mansel RE.ABC of breast diseases. Symptoms assessment and guidelines for referral. BMJ. 1994; 309(6956):722-26.
11. Sankaranarayanan R, Ramadas K, Thara S, Muwonge R, Prabhakar J, Augustine P et al. Clinical breast examination: preliminary results from a randomized controlled trial in India. J of Natl Cancer Inst.2011; 103:1476-80.
12. Kreuzer G, Boquoi E. Aspiration biopsy cytology, mammography and clinical exploration: a modern set up in diagnosis of tumors of the breast. Acta Cytol. Jul-Aug1976; 20(4):319-23.
13. Hermansen C, Skovgaard Poulsen H, Jensen J, Langfeldt B, Steenoskov V, Frederiksen P, Myhre Jensen O. Palpable breast tumors: "triple diagnosis" and operative strategy: Results of a prospective study. Acta Chir Scand.1984;150(8): 625-28.
14. Ahmed HG, Ali AS, Almobarak AO. Frequency of breast cancer among Sudanese patients with breast palpable lumps. Indian J Cancer 2010; 47:23 26.
15. Hand U, Mohan H, Bharadwaj S, Punia RPS. Fine needle aspiration as a diagnostic tool in breast lesions.I J S 2000; 62: 125-27.
16. Hari S, Srivastava A, Thulkar S. Scope of Breast Imaging in Developing Countries.NJR. 2013;vol 3(2):11-30.
17. Amr SS, Rahman A, Sadi M, Ilahi F, Sheikh SS. The Spectrum of Breast Diseases in Saudi Arab Females: A 26 yr Pathological Survey at Dhahran Health Center. Ann Saudi Med. 1995; 15(2):125-32.
18. Malik R, Bharadwaj VK. Breast lesions in young females - a 20 year study for significance of earlyrecognition. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2003; 46:559-66.
19. Kulkarni S, Vora I M, Ghorpade K G, Shrivastava S. Histopathological spectrum of breast lesions with reference to uncommon cases. Obst Gynecol India. 2009; Vol.59(5):444-52.
20. Rasheed A, Sharma S, Rasool M, Bashir S, Hafiz A, Bashir N. A three year study of breast lesions in women aged 15-70 years in a tertiary care hospital. Sch J App Med Sci. 2014;2(IB):166-68.
21. Iyer SP, Gore MA. Epidemiology of Benign Breast Diseases in Females of Child Bearing age group.(internet). http://www.bhj.org.in/journal/2000_4201_jan00/original_141.htm
22. Mayun AA, Pindija VH, Babayo UD. Pattern of histopathological diagnosis of breast lesion in Gombe, Nigeria. Nigerian J Med. 2008; 17(2):159-62.
23. Bagale P, Dravid NV, Bagale S,Ahire N. Clinico-pathological study of benign breast diseases. Int J Health Sci Res. 2013; 3(2):47-54.
24. Ibrahim IM, Iliyasu Y, Mohammed AZ. Histopathological review of breast tumors in kano, Northern Nigeria. Sub-Saharan Afr J Med. 2015; 2: 47-51.
25. ur-rehman A. Histopathological Analysis of Consecutive 161 cases of Breast Lumps. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2013; 7(3): 624-25.
26. Mudholkar VG, Mashal SN, Kawade SB. Histopathological Study of Neoplastic Lesions of Breast.Indian Medical Gazette. 2012;145(9):353-64.
27. Bane AL, Beck JC, Bleiweiss I, Buys SS, Catalano E, Daly MB et al. BRCA2 Mutation- associated Breast Cancers exhibit a distinguishing phenotype based on morphology and molecular profiles fromtissue microarrays. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31:121-28.
28. Pant I, Singh PK, Singh SN, Agarwal A, Singh NB. Cytomorphologic study of palpable breast lesions and histopathologic correlation. Journal of Cytology. 2003; 20 (3): 129-32.
29. Vala MT, Goswami A, Suri SK. Comparative study of cytological and histopathological finding in breast lesion. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS). 2014;13(7): 5-7.
30. Taori K, Dhakate S, Rathod J, Hatgaonkar A, Disawal A,Wavare P. Evaluation of Breast Masses Using Mammography and Sonography as First Line Investigations. Open Journal of Medical Imaging.2013;3: 40-49.
31. Warren SL. Roentgenologic study of breast. AJR 1930; 4:113.
32. Baker LH. Breast Cancer Detection Demon- stration Project: Five-year summary report. CA. 1982;32:194-225.

Downloads

Published

31-08-2017

How to Cite

1.
Mulka A, Kotasthane VD, Dhaka R, Kotasthane DS. Correlation of Histopathological Study of Breast Lesions with cytology and mammography as a measure of internal quality and diagnostic accuracy. Ann of Pathol and Lab Med [Internet]. 2017 Aug. 31 [cited 2024 Dec. 21];4(4):A397-402. Available from: https://pacificejournals.com/journal/index.php/apalm/article/view/apalm1427

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 4 (2017)

Section

Original Article

License

Copyright (c) 2017 Anusha Mulka, Vaishali Dhananjay Kotasthane, Rajendra Dhaka, Dhananjay Shrikant Kotasthane

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html).