Frozen Section Diagnosis: Accuracy and Errors; with Emphasis on Reasons for Discordance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21276/apalm.2932Keywords:
Intra-operative consultation, Frozen section, Concordance, DiscordanceAbstract
Background: Frozen section is a multistep process involving surgical resection, intraoperative preparation of slides and their microscopic examination. It is important to assess concordant, discordant and deferred diagnosis rates from intra-operative frozen section diagnosis with final diagnosis on paraffin section and to determine the reasons for discordance. An integral part of quality assurance in surgical pathology entails the correlation of intra-operative frozen section diagnosis with final diagnosis on permanent section.
Methods: A retrospective analysis of 117 cases of frozen section biopsy was carried out which were reported in the Histopathology department between July 2007 to June 2012. The correlation between the frozen section diagnosis with final histological diagnosis was performed in order to check the accuracy of the technique. The number and type of discrepancies were compared, causes for the discrepancies were analyzed in order to decrease the avoidable errors and improve on the frozen section diagnoses.
Results: The overall accuracy of frozen section diagnoses over 5years was 90.60% with false positive rate of 0.85%, false negative rate of 6.84% and 1.71% of deferred diagnosis. Sensitivity was 87.69% and Specificity was 98%. The discrepancies were mainly due to the interpretation error, sampling error and technical artefacts.
Conclusions: Gross inspection, sampling by pathologist, frozen section complemented with cytological and histological review and cooperation between consultants can avoid certain limitations and provide rapid, reliable, cost effective information necessary for optimum patient care.
References
Raab SS, Tworek JA, Souers R, Zarbo RJ. The value of monitoring frozen section–permanent section correlation data over time. Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine. 2006 Mar;130(3):337-42.
Khoo JJ. An audit of intraoperative frozen section in Johor. The Medical journal of Malaysia. 2004 Mar 1;59(1):50-5.
Jerome BT. Frozen section and surgical pathologist. ArchPathol Lab Med 2009; 133:1135-1138.
Patil P, Shukla S, Bhake A, Hiwale K. Accuracy of frozen section analysis in correlation with surgical pathology diagnosis. Int J Res Med Sci. 2015 Feb;3(2):399-404.
Raab SS, Tworek JA, Souers R, Zarbo RJ. The value of monitoring frozen section–permanent section correlation data over time. Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine. 2006 Mar;130(3):337-42.
Mahe E, Ara S, Bishara M, Kurian A, Tauqir S, Ursani N, Vasudev P, Aziz T, Ross C, Lytwyn A. Intraoperative pathology consultation: error, cause and impact. Canadian Journal of Surgery. 2013 Jun;56(3):E13.
Hatami H, Mohsenifar Z, Alavi SN. The diagnostic accuracy of frozen section compared to permanent section: a single center study in Iran. Iranian journal of pathology. 2015;10(4):295.
Shah HS, Daveshwar MR, Rana NA. Correlation of intraoperative frozen section report and histopathological diagnosis. MedPulse International Journal of Pathology. 2019 12(3),
Chbani L, Mohamed S, Harmouch T, El Fatemi H, Amarti A. Quality assessment of intraoperative frozen sections: An analysis of 261 consecutive cases in a resource limited area: Morocco. Health. 2012 Jul 19;4(7):433-5.
Gephardt GN, Zarbo RJ. Interinstitutional comparison of frozen section consultations: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 90 538 cases in 461 institutions. Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine. 1996 Sep 1;120(9):804.
Chandramouleeswari K, Yogambal M, Arunalatha P, Bose JC, Rajendran A. Frozen and paraffin sections-Comparative study highlighting the concordance and discordance rates in a tertiary care centre. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences. 2013 Nov;12(5):26-30.
Abdelghany AM, Arafa EM, Madkour NM, Nossair WS, Mohamed EA, Abdelsalam WA, Salem AA. Accuracy of intraoperative frozen section in the diagnosis of ovarian neoplasms. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2014 Dec 25;5(01):14.
Mohammed AB, Ahuja VK, Farghaly H. Role of frozen section in the intraoperative management of ovarian masses. Middle East Fertility Society Journal. 2015 Jun 1;20(2):97-101.
Mayun AA, Pindiga UH, Abubakar A. Frozen Section: The need [12] for intra-operative consultation between the surgeon and the pathologist. BOMJ. 2006;3(2):1-2.
Açikalin A, Torun G, Bağir E, Bayram F, Zeren H, Güleç U, Güzel AB, Gümürdülü D. Intraoperative frozen section in ovarian neoplasms; a tertiary center experience. Turk Patoloji Derg. 2014 Jan 1;30(3):184-8.
Bige O, Demir A, Saygili U, Gode F, Uslu T, Koyuncuoglu M. Frozen section diagnoses of 578 ovarian tumors made by pathologists with and without expertise on gynecologic pathology. Gynecologic oncology. 2011 Oct 1;123(1):43-6.
Yarandi F, Eftekhar Z, IZADIâ€MOOD N, Shojaei H. Accuracy of intraoperative frozen section in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2008 Aug;48(4):438-41.
Rakhshan A, Zham H, Kazempour M. Accuracy of frozen section diagnosis in ovarian masses: experience at a tertiary oncology center. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics. 2009 Aug;280(2):223-8.
Subbian A, Devi UK, Bafna UD. Accuracy rate of frozen section studies in ovarian cancers: A regional cancer institute experience. Indian journal of cancer. 2013 Oct 1;50(4):302.
Toneva F, Wright H, Razvi K. Accuracy of frozen section in the diagnosis of ovarian tumours. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2012 Jul 1;32(5):479-82.
Ilvan S, Ramazanoglu R, Akyildiz EU, Calay Z, Bese T, Oruc N. The accuracy of frozen section (intraoperative consultation) in the diagnosis of ovarian masses. Gynecologic oncology. 2005 May 1;97(2):395-9.
Sukumaran R, Somanathan T, Mathews A, Kattor J, Sambasivan S, Nair RP. Role of frozen section in intraoperative assessment of ovarian masses: a tertiary oncology center experience. Indian journal of surgical oncology. 2014 Jun;5(2):99-103.
Shih KK, Garg K, Soslow RA, Chi DS, Abu-Rustum NR, Barakat RR. Accuracy of frozen section diagnosis of ovarian borderline tumor. Gynecologic oncology. 2011 Dec 1;123(3):517-21.
Kayani N, Sultana N. Validity of frozen section in the diagnosis of breast lumps: 5 years experience at the Aga Khan University Hospital. Journal of Pakistan Medical Association. 2005;55(12):533.
Rosai, J., Ackerman, L. V. (2004). Rosai and Ackerman's Surgical Pathology. Malawi: Mosby.
Yun N, Fu XL, Yong Y, Wang PP, Cao XC. Intra-operative frozen section diagnosis of breast lesions: a retrospective analysis of 13 243 Chinese patients. Chinese medical journal. 2007 Apr 1;120(8):630-5.
Sakurai T, Oura S, Tanino H, Yoshimasu T, Kokawa Y, Kinoshita T, Okamura Y. A case of granulomatous mastitis mimicking breast carcinoma. Breast cancer. 2002 Jul 1;9(3):265-8.
Asoglu O, Ozmen V, Karanlik H, Tunaci M, Cabioglu N, Igci A, Selcuk UE, Kecer M. Feasibility of surgical management in patients with granulomatous mastitis. The breast journal. 2005 Mar;11(2):108-14.
Chaney AW, Pollack A, Mcneese MD, Zagars GK, Pisters PW, Pollock RE, Hunt KK. Primary treatment of cystosarcoma phyllodes of the breast. Cancer: Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society. 2000 Oct 1;89(7):1502-11.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Roopam Kishore Gidwani, Falguni Jay Goswami, Arpan Mehta, Nirali V Shah, Shobhana Ashok Prajapati, Manisha M Shah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html).
