Automation with Basic Microbiology Techniques: The Synergy Vibrates at a Higher Octave for Clinical Anaerobic Bacteriology and Antimicrobial Stewardship
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21276/apalm.3582Keywords:
Anaerobes, Anoxomat, MALDITOF-MS, Antimicrobial stewardship, Metronidazole, BacteroidesAbstract
Background: Anaerobic bacteria are the most common normal flora that colonizes the skin and lines the mucosal surfaces of our body. Anaerobic infections are most often overlooked, and failure to provide specific antimicrobial coverage to these organisms may result in therapeutic failure. The aims of our study were to look for the Microbiology profile, antimicrobial susceptibility, and clinical correlates of various anaerobic bacteria isolated from various clinical specimens of patients using automated techniques, i.e., Anoxomat and MALDI-TOF MS/Vitek-2.
Methods: All the specimens received for anaerobic culture were processed as per standard guidelines. Direct microscopic examination of each of the specimens was also done. Identification of anaerobic bacteria was done by MALDI-TOF Vitek MS and/or Vitek-2. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the E-test method, and interpretation was done as per CLSI guidelines.
Results: A total of 910 specimens were received for anaerobic culture during the study period. Out of 910 specimens, a total of 71 bacteria were isolated anaerobically. Out of these 71 isolates, 54 were obligate anaerobes and 17 were facultative anaerobes. Out of 54 obligate anaerobes, Bacteroides sp. was isolated maximally (27.7%) followed by Prevotella sp. (24.0%). The various clinical specimens from which these anaerobes were recovered mainly included abdominal pus, perianal abscess, High vaginal swab, Urethral pus, and Breast abscess. Metronidazole resistance in Bacteroides sp. was found to be 30.7%, whereas in Prevotella sp. it was comparatively low (25%). Facultative anaerobes like various species of Streptococcus from deep-seated abscesses like Brain abscess were isolated anaerobically only.
Conclusion: Accurate and rapid detection of anaerobes due to automated methods synergizes with basic microbiological techniques, which leads to early institution of targeted therapy and thus helps in antimicrobial stewardship. Initial isolation of facultative anaerobes under anaerobic conditions only is also an interesting area of research.
References
1. Begum S, Roy S, Yusuf MA. Anaerobic bacteria: Infection and Management. J Dent Med Sci 2015;14:69-72.
2. Shenoy PA, Vishwanath S, Gawda A, Shetty S, Anegundi R, Varma M, et al. Anaerobic Bacteria in Clinical Specimens - Frequent, But a Neglected Lot: A Five Year Experience at a Tertiary Care Hospital. J Clin Diagn Res 2017;11(7):DC44-DC48.
3. Collee JG, Miles RS, Watt B. Tests for identification of bacteria. In: Collee JG, Fraser AG, Marmion BP, Simmons A eds. Mackie and McCartney Practical Medical Microbiology. 14th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1996.
4. Tille, Patricia M. Bailey & Scott's Diagnostic Microbiology. Fifteenth edition. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier, 2022.
5. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2012. Methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria. Approved standard, 8th ed. CLSI document M11-A8. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
6. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2018. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 28th informational supplement. CLSI document M100-S22. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
7. Li Y, Sun M, Zhang Z, Mao X, Yan M, Chen Y, et al. Application of MALDI-TOF MS to rapid identification of anaerobic bacteria. BMC Infect Dis 2019:19:941.
8. De A, Gogate A. Prevalence of Gram negative anaerobic bacilli in routine clinical specimens. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2001;44(4):435-38.
9. Garg R, Kaistha N. Gupta V, Chander J. Isolation, identification and antimicrobial susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria: a study re-emphasizing its role. J Clin Diagn Res 2014;8(11):DL01-DL02.
10. Ng LS, Kwang LL, Yeow SC, Tan TY. Anaerobic culture of diabetic foot infections: organisms and antimicrobial susceptibilities. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2008;37(11):936-39.
11. Saini S, Gupta N, Aparna, Lokveer, Griwan MS. Surgical infections: A microbiological study. Braz J Infect Dis 2004:8(2):118-25.
12. Singhal R, Chaudhry R, Dhawan B. Anaerobic bacteraemia in a tertiary care hospital of North India. Indian J Med Microbiol 2006;24(3):235-36.
13. Antony B, Justin S, Raveendran R, Shetty AK, Kuruvilla TS, Boloor R. Spectrum of anaerobes encountered in surgical infections in a tertiary care hospital in Mangalore, coastal Karnataka: A prospective study. Muller J Med Sci Res 2016;7(1):40-43.
14. Summanen PH, McTeague M, Väisänen ML, Strong CA, Finegold SM. Comparison of Recovery of Anaerobic Bacteria Using the Anoxomat®, Anaerobic Chamber, and GasPak® Jar Systems. Anaerobe. 1999;5(1)5-9.
15. Brazier JS, Smith SA. Evaluation of the Anoxomat: a new technique for anaerobic and microaerophilic clinical bacteriology. J Clin Pathol 1989:42(6):640-4.
16. Bizzini A, Greub G. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry, a revolution in clinical microbial identification. Clin Microbiol Infect 2010;16:1614-19.
17. Culebras E, Rodríguez-Avial I, Betriu C, Gómez M, Picazo JJ. Rapid identification of clinical isolates of Bacteroides species by matrix-assisted laser-desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Anaerobe 2012;18(1):163-5.
18. Gürsoy M, Harju 1, Matomäki J, Bryk A, Könönen E. Performance of MALDI-TOF MS for identification of oral Prevotella species. Anaerobe 2017:47:89-93.
19. Bächli P, Baars S, Simmler A, Zbinden R, Schulthess B. Impact of MALDI-TOF MS identification on anaerobic species and genus diversity in routine diagnostics. Anaerobe 2022 Jun;75:102554.
20. Alcalá L, Marín M, Ruiz A, Quiroga L, Zamora-Cintas M, Fernández-Chico MA, et al. Identifying Anaerobic Bacteria Using MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry: A Four-Year Experience. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2021:11.
21. Wren MW, Baldwin AW, Eldon CP, Sanderson PJ. The anaerobic culture of clinical specimens: a 14-month study. J Med Microbiol 1977:10(1):49-61.
22. Jamal W, Al Hashem G, Rotimi VO. Antimicrobial resistance among anaerobes isolated from clinical specimens in Kuwait hospitals: comparative analysis of 11- year data. Anaerobe 2015;31:25-30.
23. Gorbach SL, Thadepalli H. Norsen J. 1974. Anaerobic micro-organisms in intra-abdominal infections. In Anaerobic bacteria: role in disease, edited by A. Balows, R. M. DeHaan, V. R. Dowell Jr and L. B. Guze, Springfield, p. 399.
24. Tanaka K, Mikamo H, Watanabe K. Microbiology of Bartholin's Gland Abscess in Japan. J Clin Microbiol 2005;43(8):4258-61.
25. George SD, Van Gerwen OT, Dong C, Sousa LGV, Cerca N, Elnaggar JH, et al. The Role of Prevotella species in Female Genital Tract Infections. Pathogens 2024; 13(5):364.
26. Vudhya Gowrisankar Y, Manne Mudhu S, Pasupuleti SK, Suthi S, Chaudhury A, Sarma PVGK. Staphylococcus aureus grown in anaerobic conditions exhibits elevated glutamine biosynthesis and biofilm units. Can J Microbiol 2021;67(4):323-31.
27. Peake SL, Peter JV, Chan L, Wise RP, Butcher AR, Grove DI. First Report of Septicemia Caused by an Obligately Anaerobic Staphylococcus aureus Infection in a Human. J Clin Mirobiol 2006;44:2311-3.
28. Rowlinson MC, LeBourgeois P, Ward K, Song Y, Finegold SM, Bruckner DA. Isolation of a Strictly Anaerobic Strain of Staphylococcus epidermidis. J Cin Microbiol 2006:44:857-60.
29. Cramton SE, Ulrich M, Gotz F. Doring G. Anaerobic Conditions Induce Expression of Polysaccharide Intercellular Adhesin in Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Infection and Immunity 2001;69(6):4079-85.
30. Fluckiger U, Ulrich M, Steinhuber A, Doring G, Mack D, Landmann R, et al. Biofilm Formation, icaADBC Transcription, and Polysaccharide Intercellular Adhesin Synthesis by Staphylococci in a Device-Related Infection Model. Infection and Immunity 2005:73(3):1811-9.
31. Brook I, Wexler HM, Goldstein EJ. Antianaerobic antimicrobials: spectrum and susceptibility testing. Clin Microbiol Rev 2013 Jul;26(3):526-46.
32. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2023. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 33rd edition. CLSI document M100. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Hena Butta, Ghanta Naga Sai Snigdha, Leena Mendiratta, Raman Sardana, Arun Prasad, Neerav Goel, Kiranbala Dash
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html).
