Comparative Evaluation of Manual and Automated Nucleated Red Blood Cell Counts in Neonates: Insights from a Rural North Indian Tertiary Care Centre
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21276/apalm.3780Keywords:
analyser, microscopy, nucleated red blood cells, neonatesAbstract
Background:Although a small number of nucleated red blood cells (nRBCs) in neonates is physiological, their enumeration is crucial, especially in critical care, as their presence or elevation can indicate perinatal hypoxia, fetal anaemia, or other pathologic states. Clinical laboratories often prefer automated counting due to the subjectivity and time-consuming nature of manual methods.Methods:The primary aim was to study the comparison of nRBC counts using an automated haematologyanalyser versus the manual method. This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted from November 2024 to February 2025 with a sample size of 100 neonates aged 0–28 days. Automated counting utilised the Sysmex XN-1000 while the manual counting involved analysing a leishman-stained peripheral blood smear under a microscope, reporting nRBCs per 100 WBCs. Result:Of the 100 cases, the majority were male (66%), and most were 0-2 days old (83%). Common symptoms included fever (56%) and jaundice (22%). Haematological analysis showed that 90% of cases had normal haemoglobin (Hb 14-24 gm%) and 86% had normal mean corpuscular volume. Based on automated counts, 40% of cases showed nRBCs less than (<1.0 %), and 39% showed 1.1-10.0 %. Manual nRBC counting showed the majority of cases (89%) were in the 0 to 10 nRBC range.
Conclusion: Both automated and manual techniques for nRBC counting yielded comparable results. Automated analysers, such as the Sysmex XN-1000, can reliably substitute for manual methods due to their accuracy, speed, and ability to reduce workload, while also helping to eliminate human error and bias.
References
1. Finne PH, Halvorsen S. Regulation of erythropoiesis in the fetus and newborn. Arch Dis Child. 1972 Oct;47(255):683–7.
2. Pikora K, Krętowska-Grunwald A, Krawczuk-Rybak M, Sawicka-Żukowska M. Diagnostic Value and Prognostic Significance of Nucleated Red Blood Cells (NRBCs) in Selected Medical Conditions. Cells. 2023 Jul;12(14).
3. Gulati G, Behling E, Kocher W, Schwarting R. An evaluation of the performance of Sysmex XE-2100 in enumerating nucleated red cells in peripheral blood. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2007 Jul;131(7):1077–83.
4. Comar SR, Malvezzi M, Pasquini R. Evaluation of criteria of manual blood smear review following automated complete blood counts in a large university hospital. Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter. 2017;39(4):306–17.
5. Brunner-Ziegler S, Jilma B, Grimm G, Jilma-Stohlawetz P. Comparison Evaluation of Automated Nucleated Red Blood Cell Enumeration by Sysmex XN 1000 in Comparison With Microscopic Reference in Children Under 1 Year. J Clin Lab Anal. 2024 Apr;38(8):e25037.
6. Wu HM, Tang JL, Cao L, Sha ZH, Li Y. Interventions for preventing infection in nephrotic syndrome. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr;2012(4):CD003964.
7. Wang N, Jiang J, Wang J, et al. Detection of nucleated red blood cells using the Mindray BC-6800Plus hematology analyzer: a clinical performance evaluation. Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Aug;10(8):8808–17.
8. Gaffney H, Mirza KM. Pathology in the artificial intelligence era: Guiding innovation and implementation to preserve human insight. Acad Pathol. 2025;12(1):100166.
9. Sabyrbekova T, Turkmenova E, Yeoh PL, Slobodskaya O, Wong C, Chin B. Assessment and optimization plan for enhancing public medical laboratory services in the Kyrgyz Republic. PLOS Glob Public Heal [Internet]. 2025;5(7):1–14. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004840
10. Majors CE, Smith CA, Natoli ME, Kundrod KA, Richards-Kortum R. Point-of-care diagnostics to improve maternal and neonatal health in low-resource settings. Lab Chip. 2017 Oct;17(20):3351–87.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Meenakshi Singhal, Vishesh Dhawan, Ayushi Kediya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html).
How to Cite
