Driving Analytical Excellence in Biochemistry: A Four-Month Six Sigma Performance Assessment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21276/apalm.3788Keywords:
clinical laboratories, internal quality control (IQC), six sigma, quality goal index (QGI), root cause analysis (RCA)Abstract
Background: Ensuring the accuracy of biochemical tests in clinical labs is crucial for diagnosis. Six Sigma evaluates test result deviation from targets; higher values indicate fewer errors. Some tests perform poorly with sigma values below 4. This study uses Six Sigma, the Quality Goal Index (QGI), and Root Cause Analysis (RCA) to identify and improve performance issues.Methods: Data were collected daily for IQC at two levels and monthly for external assessments over four months. CV, bias, and Total Allowable Error were used to calculate sigma values for 16 biochemical analytes. QGI analysis identified discrepancies, and RCA uncovered reasons for poor results.
Results: Urea, protein, phosphate, high-density lipoprotein, alanine aminotransferase, and iron had sigma values ≤4.0. Glucose, creatinine, albumin, uric acid, and triglyceride in Level 1, and albumin, triglyceride, and alanine aminotransferase in Level 2, showed sigma values of 4–5. Level 2 glucose, creatinine, uric acid, and cholesterol were in the 5–6 sigma range. Ten analytes across Levels 1 and 2 had sigma values ≥6. For σ < 4 analytes, QGI showed inaccuracy. IQC reconstitution, storage temperature, and air bubbles affected performance.
Conclusion: Six Sigma methodology improves laboratory testing quality. Regular monitoring and addressing root causes lead to more accurate results and better patient care.
References
1. Gupta GK, Singh A, Manikandan SV, Ehtesham A. Digital Diagnostics: The Potential of Large Language Models in Recognizing Symptoms of Common Illnesses. AI. 2025 Jan 16;6(1):13.
2. Favaloro EJ, (Adcock) Funk DM, Lippi G. Pre-analytical Variables in Coagulation Testing Associated With Diagnostic Errors in Hemostasis. Lab Med. 2012 Feb 1;43(2):1.2-10.
3. Gras JM, Philippe M. Application of the Six Sigma concept in clinical laboratories: a review. Clinical Chemical Laboratory Medicine. 2007 Jan 1;45(6).
4. Guo X, Zhang T, Gao X, Li P, You T, Wu Q, et al. Sigma metrics for assessing the analytical quality of clinical chemistry assays: a comparison of two approaches. Biochemia Medica. 2018 June 15;28(2).
5. Kumar BV, Mohan T. Sigma metrics as a tool for evaluating the performance of internal quality control in a clinical chemistry laboratory. J Lab Physicians. 2018 Jan 1;10(2):194–199.
6. Ehrmeyer SS, Laessig RH, Leinweber JE, Oryall JJ. 1990 Medicare/CLIA final rules for proficiency testing: minimum intralaboratory performance characteristics (CV and bias) needed to pass. Clinical Chemistry. 1990 Oct 1;36(10):1736–1740.
7. Sciacovelli L, Secchiero S, Padoan A, Plebani M. External quality assessment programs in the context of ISO 15189 accreditation. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM). 2018 May 23;56(10):1644–1654.
8. Zhou B, Wu Y, He H, Li C, Tan L, Cao Y. Practical application of Six Sigma management in analytical biochemistry processes in clinical settings. Clinical Laboratory Analysis. 2019 Nov 27;34(1).
9. Lippi G, Jackson B, Plebani M. Improving diagnosis in health care: laboratory medicine. Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany). 2025 Aug 22;12(4):570–577.
10. Thakur V, Akerele OA, Randell E. Lean and Six Sigma as continuous quality improvement frameworks in the clinical diagnostic laboratory. Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences. 2022 Aug 16;60(1):63–81.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Shahid Ali, Sana Alam, Jaspreet Kaur
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html).
How to Cite
