Morphological Spectrum of Megakaryocytic Alterations in Bone Marrow Aspiration and Biopsy of Patients with Thrombocytopenia – A Tertiary Care Hospital Based Study

Authors

  • Rushali Patel Department of Pathology, Pramukhswami Medical College & Shree Krishna Hospital, Bhaikaka University, Karamsad, Gujarat, India
  • Keyuri Patel Department of Pathology, Pramukhswami Medical College & Shree Krishna Hospital, Bhaikaka University, Karamsad, Gujarat, India
  • Zalak Parmar Department of Pathology, Pramukhswami Medical College & Shree Krishna Hospital, Bhaikaka University, Karamsad, Gujarat, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21276/apalm.3799

Keywords:

bone marrow aspiration and biopsy, megakaryocytes, thrombocytopenia

Abstract

Background: Megakaryocyte morphology is vital for platelet production, and abnormalities at any developmental stage can lead to thrombocytopenia(<150,000/µL). Bone marrow evaluation helps distinguish decreased platelet production from increased peripheral destruction. This prospective study assessed dysplastic and non-dysplastic megakaryocytic changes in thrombocytopenia, bicytopenia, and pancytopenia, including non-MDS disorders. Aim and objectives: To study megakaryocytic alterations in a patient with thrombocytopenia, bicytopenia, and pancytopenia in BMA and BMB. The study goal was to provide a comprehensive morphological assessment and support clinical correlation in haematological disorders.

Materials and methods: The study at Pramukhswami medical college, included 55 thrombocytopenia cases. Bone marrow aspiration and biopsy were reviewed independently by two hematopathologists. Inter-observer discrepancies were resolved by consensus review to standardize findings. Megakaryocyte counts were assessed per 10 LPF, with morphology evaluated in at least 30 cells. Dysplasia was strictly defined as abnormalities in ≥10% of megakaryocytes.

Results: ITP(18.2%), AOCD(12.7%), and AML(10.9%) were the leading causes of thrombocytopenia. Megakaryocyte counts were increased in ITP and AOCD due to compensatory marrow response, and reduced in aplastic anaemia and AML because of marrow suppression. Dysplastic megakaryocytic features were commonly seen in ITP, AOCD, and AML, along with frequent non-dysplastic changes such as hypolobation, immaturity, emperipolesis, and bare nuclei. Bone marrow aspiration offered better cytological detail, while biopsy was superior for evaluating marrow architecture.

Conclusion: Bone marrow aspiration and biopsy are essential for assessing megakaryocyte number and morphology in thrombocytopenia, bicytopenia, and pancytopenia. Identifying dysplastic features in non-MDS conditions like ITP, IAT and AOCD highlights the need for careful clinical correlation to avoid misdiagnosis.

References

1. Hoffbrand AV, Higgs DR, Keeling DM, Mehta AB, editors. Postgraduate haematology. 7th ed. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons; 2016.

2. Lewis SM, Bain BJ, Bates I. Dacie and Lewis Practical Haematology. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier; 2006.

3. Rodak B, Fritsma G, Keohane E. Rodak's Hematology: Clinical Principles and Applications. 5th ed. St. Louis: Saunders; 2016.

4. Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, et al., editors. WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC; 2008.

5. Limijadi EK, Devi WR, Tjitradinata C. The Difference between Coagulation Profile and Fibrinolysis in Acute and Chronic Leukemia Patients. Indonesian Journal of Clinical Pathology and Medical Laboratory. 2025 Feb 20;31(2):134-9.

6. Kaushansky K. Thrombopoietin: the primary regulator of platelet production. Blood. 1995;86(2):419-43

7. Spronk HM, Padro T, Siland JE, Prochaska JH, Winters J, Van Der Wal AC, Posthuma JJ, Lowe G, d'Alessandro E, Wenzel P, Coenen DM. Atherothrombosis and thromboembolism: position paper from the Second Maastricht Consensus Conference on Thrombosis. Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 2018 Feb;118(02):229-50.

8. Metcalf D. Hematopoietic regulators: redundancy or subtlety?. Blood. 1993 Dec 15;82(12):3515-23.

9. Arciprete F. The Changes In The Megakaryocyte Lineage Contribute To MPN progression: the Immature Niche Megakaryocytes are associated with Myelofibrosis.

10. Bain BJ, Ahmad S. Dysmegakaryopoiesis in non-myelodysplastic disorders. Br J Haematol. 2015;170(6):821–830.

11. Neunert CE, Arnold DM, Grace RF, Kuhne T, McCrae KR, Terrell DR. The 2022 review of the 2019 American Society of Hematology guidelines on immune thrombocytopenia. Blood Advances. 2024 Jul 9;8(13):3578-82.

12. Bain BJ. Bone marrow biopsy morbidity and mortality. British journal of haematology. 2003 Jun;121(6):949-51.

13. Wickramasinghe SN, Fida S. Bone marrow morphology in health and disease. J Clin Pathol. 1994;47(8):681–689.

14. Lichtman MA, Kaushansky K, Prchal JT, et al. Williams Hematology. 9th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2016.

15. Young NS. Aplastic anemia. New England Journal of Medicine. 2018 Oct 25;379(17):1643-56.

16. Bhasin TS, Sharma S, Manjari M, et al. Changes in megakaryocytes in cases of thrombocytopenia: bone marrow aspiration and biopsy analysis. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(3):473-7.

17. Muhury M, Mathai AM, Rai S, Naik R, Pai MR, Sinha R. Megakaryocytic alterations in thrombocytopenia: a bone marrow aspiration study. Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology. 2009 Oct 1;52(4):490-4.

18. Veerpaneni S, Sasturkar RC. Megakaryocytic alterations in thrombocytopenia: a bone marrow aspiration study. Int J Sci Res. 2020;9:220-6.

19. Sharma R, Kiran CM, Ramdas A. Morphological Alterations in Megakaryocytes in Bone Marrow Aspirate of Thrombocytopenia Cases. J Blood Lymph 9: 235. of. 2019;3:2.

20. Pokharel S, Upadhyaya P, Karki S, Paudyal P, Pradhan B, Poudel P. Megakaryocytic alterations in thrombocytopenia: a bone marrow aspiration study. Journal of Pathology of Nepal. 2016 Mar 17;6(11):914-21.

Downloads

Published

02-03-2026

Issue

Section

Original Article

How to Cite

1.
Morphological Spectrum of Megakaryocytic Alterations in Bone Marrow Aspiration and Biopsy of Patients with Thrombocytopenia – A Tertiary Care Hospital Based Study. Ann of Pathol and Lab Med [Internet]. 2026 Mar. 2 [cited 2026 Mar. 4];13(3):A123-A134. Available from: https://pacificejournals.com/journal/index.php/apalm/article/view/3799