Bridging the Diagnostic Gap: The Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Modern Hematology- A Narrative Review

Authors

  • Shweta Chaturvedi Department of Pathology, AlFalah School of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Faridabad, Haryana, India
  • Malika Mehta Aggarwal Department of Pathology, AlFalah School of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Faridabad, Haryana, India
  • Shafaque Zabin Department of Pathology, AlFalah School of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Faridabad, Haryana, India
  • Vinod Raghava Department of Pathology, AlFalah School of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Faridabad, Haryana, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21276/apalm.3964

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, machine learning, hematology, digital pathology, deep learning

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative technology in hematology, addressing the increasing complexity of hematologic diagnosis and the growing demand for rapid, accurate, and reproducible interpretation of morphological, immunophenotypic, cytogenetic, and molecular data. Machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques have demonstrated significant potential to augment conventional diagnostic workflows and support precision medicine.

Objective: To provide a comprehensive narrative review of the research progress of various AI-assisted systems applied in the clinical diagnosis and treatment of hematological diseases, with a specific focus on their utility in morphology, immunology, cytogenetics, molecular biology, prognosis prediction, and therapeutic planning, while highlighting existing challenges and future directions for clinical implementation.

Key Findings: AI technologies, including image-recognition, genomic data analysis, and pattern recognition, significantly shorten turnaround times, reduce diagnostic costs, and enhance the accuracy of disease outcome predictions. Despite these gains, implementation is constrained by the lack of standardized AI products and datasets, limited medical–industrial collaboration, the "black box" nature of complex AI systems, and regulatory concerns regarding data privacy.

Conclusion: Artificial intelligence is poised to become an integral component of diagnostic hematology by improving diagnostic accuracy and workflow efficiency. Although AI is unlikely to replace hematologists, it will increasingly function as a valuable decision-support tool. Continued multicenter validation, regulatory oversight, and interdisciplinary collaboration are essential for safe and effective integration of AI into routine hematology practice.

References

1. Tang G, Fu X, Wang Z, Chen M. A machine learning tool using digital microscopy (Morphogo) for the identification of abnormal lymphocytes in the bone marrow. Acta Cytologica. 2021 Aug 18;65(4):354-7.

2. Wang SX, Huang ZF, Li J, Wu Y, Du J, Li T. Optimization of diagnosis and treatment of hematological diseases via artificial intelligence. Frontiers in Medicine. 2024 Nov 7;11:1487234.

3. Singh K, Singh A. Artificial intelligence in hematology: A critical perspective. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hematology. 2024 Sep 2;3(1):60-6.

4. Nazha A, Elemento O, Ahuja S, Lam B, Miles M, Shouval R, McWeeney S, Sirhan S, Srisuwananukorn A, Haferlach T. Artificial intelligence in hematology. Blood. 2025 Aug 26.

5. Ghaderzadeh M, Asadi F, Hosseini A, Bashash D, Abolghasemi H, Roshanpour A. Machine learning in detection and classification of leukemia using smear blood images: a systematic review. Scientific programming. 2021;2021(1):9933481.

6. Tang M, Antić Ž, Fardzadeh P, Pietzsch S, Schröder C, Eberhardt A, van Bömmel A, Escherich G, Hofmann W, Horstmann MA, Illig T. An artificial intelligence-assisted clinical framework to facilitate diagnostics and translational discovery in hematologic neoplasia. EBioMedicine. 2024 Jun 1;104.

7. Padmanabhan R, El Alaoui Y, Elomri A, Qaraqe MK, El Omri H, Yasin Taha R. Machine Learning for Diagnosis and Screening of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Using Routine Complete Blood Count (CBC) Results. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2023 Jun 29;305:279-282. doi: 10.3233/SHTI230483. PMID: 37387017.

8. Eckardt JN, Middeke JM, Riechert S, Schmittmann T, Sulaiman AS, Kramer M, Sockel K, Kroschinsky F, Schuler U, Schetelig J, Röllig C. Deep learning detects acute myeloid leukemia and predicts NPM1 mutation status from bone marrow smears. Leukemia. 2022 Jan;36(1):111-8.

9. Pan L, Liu G, Lin F, Zhong S, Xia H, Sun X, Liang H. Machine learning applications for prediction of relapse in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Scientific reports. 2017 Aug 7;7(1):7402.

10. Liao H, Zhang F, Chen F, Li Y, Sun Y, Sloboda DD, Zheng Q, Ying B, Hu T. Application of artificial intelligence in laboratory hematology: Advances, challenges, and prospects. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B. 2025 Jun 3.

11. Obeagu EI. Revolutionizing hematological disorder diagnosis: unraveling the role of artificial intelligence. Annals of Medicine and Surgery. 2025 Jun 1;87(6):3445-57.

12. Rad MS, Huang JV, Hosseini MM, Choudhary R, Siezen H, Akabari R, Jamaspishvili T, El-Zammar O, Patel P, Carello SJ, Nasr MR. Deep learning for digital pathology: A critical overview of methodological framework. Journal of Pathology Informatics. 2025 Sep 8:100514.

13. Schnegg-Kaufmann AS, Bacher U, Rovó A, Andres M, Wiedemann G, Porret N, Moshaver B, Kaufmann N, Tchinda J, Meyer SC, Angelillo-Scherrer A. Artificial intelligence in haematologic diagnostics: Current applications and future perspectives. Acta Haematologica. 2025 Oct 10.

14. Nambiar R, Bhat R, Achar H B. Advancements in Hematologic Malignancy Detection: A Comprehensive Survey of Methodologies and Emerging Trends. The Scientific World Journal. 2025;2025(1):1671766.

15. Duetz C, Bachas C, Westers TM, van de Loosdrecht AA. Computational analysis of flow cytometry data in hematological malignancies: future clinical practice?. Current Opinion in Oncology. 2020 Mar 1;32(2):162-9.

16. Moraes LO, Pedreira CE, Barrena S, Lopez A, Orfao A. A decision-tree approach for the differential diagnosis of chronic lymphoid leukemias and peripheral B-cell lymphomas. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. 2019 Sep 1;178:85-90.

17. Sabile JM, Zhang P, Parwani AV, Chobrutsiky B, Gandhi AP, Srisuwananukorn A. Toward Clinically Actionable Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Algorithms in Acute Leukemia: A Systematic Narrative Review. Acta Haematologica. 2025 Aug 14;148(5):587-603.

18. Kockwelp M, et al. Fully automated deep learning pipeline for predicting genetic aberrations in acute myeloid leukemia from bone marrow smears. Science Translational Medicine. 2023;15(698):eabq4391.

19. Carreras J, Nakamura N, Hamoudi R. Artificial intelligence analysis of gene expression predicted the overall survival of mantle cell lymphoma and a large pan-cancer series. Healthcare. 2022 Jan 14;10(1):155. MDPI.

20. Gunčar G, Kukar M, Notar M, Brvar M, Černelč P, Notar M, Notar M. An application of machine learning to haematological diagnosis. Scientific reports. 2018 Jan 11;8(1):411.

21. El Alaoui Y, Elomri A, Qaraqe M, Padmanabhan R, Yasin Taha R, El Omri H, El Omri A, Aboumarzouk O. A review of artificial intelligence applications in hematology management: current practices and future prospects. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2022 Jul 12;24(7):e36490.

22. Li Z, Zhao J, Huang L, Chen X, Wei J, Tian W. Artificial intelligence reshaping the paradigm of hematologic malignancy diagnosis and treatment: From static assessment to dynamic precision management. Annals of Hematology. 2026 May;105(5):241.

23. Eckardt JN, Middeke JM. Promises and challenges of artificial intelligence in haematological diagnostics. British Journal of Haematology. 2025 Sep;207(3):754-6.

24. Iwata H, Shibayama T, Watanabe M, Shimohiro H. Toward Clinical Reliability: Visualizing and Interpreting AI-based Classification in Peripheral Blood Smear Analysis. Machine Learning with Applications. 2025 Oct 31:100780.

25. Luu HS. Laboratory data as a potential source of bias in healthcare artificial intelligence and machine learning models. Annals of laboratory medicine. 2025 Jan 1;45(1):12-21.

26. Von Bahr J, Diwan V, Mårtensson A, Linder N, Lundin J. AI-supported digital microscopy diagnostics in primary health care laboratories: protocol for a scoping review. JMIR Research Protocols. 2024 Nov 1;13(1):e58149.

Downloads

Published

05-09-2026

Issue

Section

Review Article

How to Cite

1.
Bridging the Diagnostic Gap: The Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Modern Hematology- A Narrative Review. Ann of Pathol and Lab Med [Internet]. 2026 Sep. 5 [cited 2026 Sep. 6];13(9):R11-R17. Available from: https://pacificejournals.com/journal/index.php/apalm/article/view/3964