Blood donor deferral analysis: A tertiary care centre experience.

Authors

  • Harjot Kaur Department of Pathology, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Amritsar , Punjab, India
  • Rahul Mannan Department of Pathology, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Amritsar , Punjab, India
  • Mridu Manjari Department of Pathology , Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Amritsar , Punjab, India
  • Sonam Sharma Department of Pathology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
  • Tania Garg Department of Pathology, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Amritsar , Punjab, India
  • Tejinder Bhasin

Keywords:

Blood bank, Deferral, Donors, Punjab, Repeat, First time

Abstract

Background: Blood donor selection is important to ensure the safety of  both donors and recipients. There is a paucity of data on reasons for blood donor deferral in Punjab. The aim of this study was to identify the reasons for predonation deferral at a blood collection site at a blood bank of a tertiary care teaching hospital.

Method: The investigators conducted retrospectively of data pertaining to donor deferral for blood donors from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014.

Results: Among 8523 donors reporting to our blood bank during the one year period, 91 % were males. Of these, 7927 (93%) attempted donation, while 596 (6.9%) were deferred. Among the deferred, 342 (57.4%) were deferred for temporary reasons and 254 (42.6%) for permanent or semi-permanent reasons. Main reasons for temporary deferral were low hemoglobin (17.25%), alcohol abuse (13.15% ) and tattooing (12.18%). A positive history of cardiac abnormalities with high blood pressure ( 37.4%) followed by age disparity ( age , 18 years or > 65 years)- 25.98 % and practicing unsafe sex or drug abuse (13.77%) were the main reasons for permanent/semi-permanent deferrals.

Statistically it was noted that the overall proportion of deferral was higher in males (5.3% vs 1.1%, p < 0.0001), and first-time donors (4.97% vs 2.01%, p < 0.0001)

Conclusion: First time donors are more frequently deferred than repeat donors, especially because of interview decisions and presence of high risk behaviour. The study suggests the importance of recruiting repeated blood donors for better hemovigilance and blood safety practices.

 

References

1. World Health Organization. Towards 100% voluntary blood donation. Available online: www.who.int/entity/bloodsafety/publications/9789241599696_eng.pdf
2. Eder A: Evidence-based selection criteria to protect blood donors. J Clin Apher 2010;25:331-337.
3. Goncalez TT, Sabino EC, Schlumpf KS, Wright DJ, Mendrone A, Lopes M, et al . NHBLI Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study –II (REDS-II), International Component. Analysis of Donor Deferral at three blood centres in Brazil. Transfusion 2013; 53:531-8.
4. Custer B, Johnson ES, Sullivan SD, et al. Quantifying losses to the donated blood supply due to donor deferral and miscollection. Transfusion 2004; 44(10):1417-26.
5. Smith GA, Fischer SA, Doree C, Roberts DJ. A systematic review of factors associated with the deferral of donors failing to meet low hemoglobin thresholds. Transfusion Med 2013;23(5): 309-20.
6. Agnihotri N. Whole blood donor deferral analysis at a center in Western India. Asian J Transfus Sci 2010;4(2):116-22.
7. Chaudhary RK, Gupta D, Gupta RK. Analysis of donor-deferral pattern in a voluntary blood donor population. Transfus Med 1995;5(3):209-12.
8. Bahadur S, Jain S, Goel RK, Pahuja S, Jain M. Analysis of blood donor deferral characteristics in Delhi, India. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2009;40(5):1087-91.

9. Zou S, Musavi F, Notari EP, et al. Donor deferral and resulting donor loss at the American Red Cross Blood Services, 2001 through 2006.Transfusion 2008;48(12):2531-9.
10. Lawson-Ayayi S, Salmi LR. Epidemiology of blood collection in France. Eur J Epidemiol 1999;15(3):285-92.
11. Arslan O. Whole blood donor deferral rate and characteristics of the Turkish population. Transfus Med 2007;17(5):379-83.
12 Lim JC, Tien SL, Ong YW. Main causes of pre-donation deferral of prospective blood donors in the Singapore Blood Transfusion Service. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1993;22(3):326-31.
13. Shaz BH, James AB, Hillyer KL, Schreiber GB, Hillyer CD. Demographic variations in blood donor deferrals in a major metropolitan area. Transfusion. 2010;50(4):881-7.
14. Noma AM, Goto A, Nollet KE, Sawamura Y, Ohto H, Yasumura S. Blood Donor Deferral among Students in Northern Japan: Challenges Ahead. Transfus Med Hemother 2014; 41(4): 251-6.
15. Sundar P, Sangeetha SK, Seema DM, Marimuthu P, Shivanna N. Pre-donation deferral of blood donors in South Indian set-up: An analysis. Asian J Transfus Sci 2010;4(2):112-5.
16. Halperin D, Baetens J, Newman B. The effect of short-term, temporary deferral on future blood donation. Transfusion 1998;38(2):181-3.
17. Di Lorenzo Oliveira C, Loureiro F, de Bastos MR, Proietta FA, Cameiro-Proietti AB. Blood donor deferral in Minas Gerais State, Brazil: blood centers as sentinels of urban population health. Transfusion 2009;49(5):851–7.
18. Kasraian L, Negarestani N. Rates and reasons for blood donor deferral, Shiraz, Iran. A retrospective study. Sao Paulo Med J 2015; 133(1):36-42.
19. Ekwere TA, Ino-Ekanem M, Motilewa OO, Iquo Augustine Ibanga. Pattern of blood donor deferral in a tertiary hospital, South-south, Nigeria: A three-year study review. Int J Blood Transfus Immunohematol 2014;4:7–13.
20. Gajjar H, Shah FR, Shah NR. Whole blood donor deferral analysis at General Hospital Blood Bank- A Retrospective study . NHL Journal of Medical Sciences 2014; 3(2):71-6.

Downloads

Published

08-11-2016

How to Cite

1.
Kaur H, Mannan R, Manjari M, Sharma S, Garg T, Bhasin T. Blood donor deferral analysis: A tertiary care centre experience. Ann of Pathol and Lab Med [Internet]. 2016 Nov. 8 [cited 2024 Nov. 19];3(5):A471-475. Available from: https://pacificejournals.com/journal/index.php/apalm/article/view/apalm976

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 5 (2016): (Suppl) November

Section

Original Article

License

Copyright (c) 2016 Harjot Kaur, Rahul Mannan, Mridu Manjari, Sonam Sharma, Tania Garg, Tejinder Bhasin

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html).