Clinical Relevance of Anti-S and Anti-M Antibodies in Crossmatch Incompatibility: A Case Series

Authors

  • Dipshikhaa Ravi Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, India
  • Ashwin Anadan Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, India
  • R. Krishnamoorthy Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, India
  • Niranj Rathan Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, India
  • Sampat Kumar Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21276/apalm.3725

Keywords:

alloimmunization, transfusion medicine, crossmatch incompatibility, red cell antibodies, anti-s, anti-m, mns blood group system

Abstract

Background: Alloimmunization is a challenge in transfusion medicine, especially among patients with prior transfusions or pregnancies. Crossmatch incompatibility from unexpected red cell antibodies can delay transfusions, impact outcomes, and cause hemolysis.Aim: To highlight the clinical significance of anti-S and anti-M antibodies of the MNS system in crossmatch incompatibility, by summarizing six cases managed in our department.Methods: We present a retrospective case series of six patients exhibiting serologic incompatibility during pre-transfusion testing between May 2024 and May 2025 at a tertiary care center. Antibody screening and identification were conducted using column agglutination technology (CAT, Ortho vision) with 3-cell and 11-cell commercial panels. Quality control was ensured according to manufacturer protocols. Compatible and incompatible units were recorded using standardized grading and QC systems.Results: Among 55,542 crossmatched patients, six (all females; mean age 36 years; range 11–53) showed crossmatch incompatibility owing to Anti-S (4/6) or Anti-M (2/6) antibodies. Most had prior transfusion or pregnancy history. Anti-M was reactive at 37°C/AHG phase in both cases. Compatible units were identified and transfused as indicated; overall, 51 units were crossmatched (29 incompatible, 22 compatible, see Table 1). Four patients were transfused uneventfully with compatible antigen-negative units.Conclusion: Early identification of clinically significant red cell antibodies and provision of antigen-negative blood are crucial for safe transfusion. Anti-S and Anti-M antibodies, although uncommon, should be considered during incompatibility evaluation, particularly in settings with high transfusion exposure or pregnancy rates.

References

1. Vidushi, Sidhu M, Shah SN. Evaluation of incompatible crossmatch. Glob J Transfus Med 2020;5:68-72.

2. Miah SS, Doha MA, Islam A, Quader MA. Crossmatch incompatibility, indwelling experience from a single center, Bangladesh. Glob J Transfus Med 2021;6:61-4.

3. S, ShoganRaj & M, Sri & R, Sreedevi & M, Chitra. (2024). EVALUATION OF INCOMPATIBLE CROSSMATCHES AT A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL IN CHENNAI – A PROSPECTIVE STUDY. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research. 153-155. 10.22159/ajpcr.2024.v17i3.50357.

4. American Association of Blood Banks (AABB). Technical Manual. 21st ed. AABB, 2025, Bethesda, MD

5. Trudell KS. Detection and identification of antibodies. In: Harmening DM (ed.). Modern blood banking and transfusion practices, 7th edn. Philadelphia: FA Davis,: 232–263.

6. Makroo RN, Vimarsh Riana, Rosamma NL, Rashmi S.; Detection of alloimmunization to ensure safer transfusion practice; Asian Journal of Transfusion Science, Vol. 7, No. 2, July-December, 2013, pp. 135-139.

7. Bhatt JK, Patel TR, Gajjar MD, Solanki MV, Bhatnagar NM, Shah SD.Evaluation of incompatible crossmatch at blood bank of a tertiary care teaching hospital in Western India. Pathol Lab Med 2016;7. Available from: http://www.openventio.org

8. Klein HG, Anstee DJ. Other red cell antigens. In: Klein HG, Anstee DJ, editors. Mollison's blood transfusion in clinical medicine. 11th ed. London: Blackwell Science; 2005. p. 209–52.

9. Bhattacharya P, Samanta E, Afroza N, Naik A, Biswas R. An approach to incompatible cross-matched red cells: Our experience in a major regional blood transfusion center at Kolkata, Eastern India. Asian J Transfus Sci. 2018 Jan-Jun;12(1):51-56. doi: 10.4103/ajts.AJTS_157_16. PMID: 29563676; PMCID: PMC5850698.

10. Rakesh P. Pimpaldara, Arpit C. Patel, Jitendra Patel, Snehal Patel, A. N. Pandya, Sangita Wadhwani “A Study of Irregular Antibodies in 200 Multi-Transfused Patients”. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences 2015; Vol. 4, Issue 73, September 10; Page: 12659-12667, DOI: 10.14260/jemds/2015/1825

11. Saran, R.K. (Ed.) (2003). Transfusion Medicine Technical Manual (3nd ed.). New Delhi: Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India.

Downloads

Published

05-01-2026

Issue

Section

Case Report / Case Series

How to Cite

1.
Clinical Relevance of Anti-S and Anti-M Antibodies in Crossmatch Incompatibility: A Case Series. Ann of Pathol and Lab Med [Internet]. 2026 Jan. 5 [cited 2026 Jan. 7];13(1):C28-C33. Available from: https://pacificejournals.com/journal/index.php/apalm/article/view/3725