Clinical Relevance of Anti-S and Anti-M Antibodies in Crossmatch Incompatibility: A Case Series
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21276/apalm.3725Keywords:
alloimmunization, transfusion medicine, crossmatch incompatibility, red cell antibodies, anti-s, anti-m, mns blood group systemAbstract
Background: Alloimmunization is a challenge in transfusion medicine, especially among patients with prior transfusions or pregnancies. Crossmatch incompatibility from unexpected red cell antibodies can delay transfusions, impact outcomes, and cause hemolysis.Aim: To highlight the clinical significance of anti-S and anti-M antibodies of the MNS system in crossmatch incompatibility, by summarizing six cases managed in our department.Methods: We present a retrospective case series of six patients exhibiting serologic incompatibility during pre-transfusion testing between May 2024 and May 2025 at a tertiary care center. Antibody screening and identification were conducted using column agglutination technology (CAT, Ortho vision) with 3-cell and 11-cell commercial panels. Quality control was ensured according to manufacturer protocols. Compatible and incompatible units were recorded using standardized grading and QC systems.Results: Among 55,542 crossmatched patients, six (all females; mean age 36 years; range 11–53) showed crossmatch incompatibility owing to Anti-S (4/6) or Anti-M (2/6) antibodies. Most had prior transfusion or pregnancy history. Anti-M was reactive at 37°C/AHG phase in both cases. Compatible units were identified and transfused as indicated; overall, 51 units were crossmatched (29 incompatible, 22 compatible, see Table 1). Four patients were transfused uneventfully with compatible antigen-negative units.Conclusion: Early identification of clinically significant red cell antibodies and provision of antigen-negative blood are crucial for safe transfusion. Anti-S and Anti-M antibodies, although uncommon, should be considered during incompatibility evaluation, particularly in settings with high transfusion exposure or pregnancy rates.References
1. Vidushi, Sidhu M, Shah SN. Evaluation of incompatible crossmatch. Glob J Transfus Med 2020;5:68-72.
2. Miah SS, Doha MA, Islam A, Quader MA. Crossmatch incompatibility, indwelling experience from a single center, Bangladesh. Glob J Transfus Med 2021;6:61-4.
3. S, ShoganRaj & M, Sri & R, Sreedevi & M, Chitra. (2024). EVALUATION OF INCOMPATIBLE CROSSMATCHES AT A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL IN CHENNAI – A PROSPECTIVE STUDY. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research. 153-155. 10.22159/ajpcr.2024.v17i3.50357.
4. American Association of Blood Banks (AABB). Technical Manual. 21st ed. AABB, 2025, Bethesda, MD
5. Trudell KS. Detection and identification of antibodies. In: Harmening DM (ed.). Modern blood banking and transfusion practices, 7th edn. Philadelphia: FA Davis,: 232–263.
6. Makroo RN, Vimarsh Riana, Rosamma NL, Rashmi S.; Detection of alloimmunization to ensure safer transfusion practice; Asian Journal of Transfusion Science, Vol. 7, No. 2, July-December, 2013, pp. 135-139.
7. Bhatt JK, Patel TR, Gajjar MD, Solanki MV, Bhatnagar NM, Shah SD.Evaluation of incompatible crossmatch at blood bank of a tertiary care teaching hospital in Western India. Pathol Lab Med 2016;7. Available from: http://www.openventio.org
8. Klein HG, Anstee DJ. Other red cell antigens. In: Klein HG, Anstee DJ, editors. Mollison's blood transfusion in clinical medicine. 11th ed. London: Blackwell Science; 2005. p. 209–52.
9. Bhattacharya P, Samanta E, Afroza N, Naik A, Biswas R. An approach to incompatible cross-matched red cells: Our experience in a major regional blood transfusion center at Kolkata, Eastern India. Asian J Transfus Sci. 2018 Jan-Jun;12(1):51-56. doi: 10.4103/ajts.AJTS_157_16. PMID: 29563676; PMCID: PMC5850698.
10. Rakesh P. Pimpaldara, Arpit C. Patel, Jitendra Patel, Snehal Patel, A. N. Pandya, Sangita Wadhwani “A Study of Irregular Antibodies in 200 Multi-Transfused Patients”. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences 2015; Vol. 4, Issue 73, September 10; Page: 12659-12667, DOI: 10.14260/jemds/2015/1825
11. Saran, R.K. (Ed.) (2003). Transfusion Medicine Technical Manual (3nd ed.). New Delhi: Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dipshikhaa Ravi, Ashwin Anadan, R. Krishnamoorthy, Niranj Rathan, Sampat Kumar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html).
